Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Child 0-5
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Carolina

25.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Carolina

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. James Island 0.95% 22.4% (-21.4)#1 18.1% (-17.1)#94
2. Five Forks 1.3% 22.4% (-21.1)#2 18.1% (-16.8)#156
3. North Augusta 1.4% 22.4% (-20.9)#3 18.1% (-16.6)#186
4. Lyman 1.9% 22.4% (-20.4)#4 18.1% (-16.1)#326
5. Red Bank 2.0% 22.4% (-20.3)#5 18.1% (-16.0)#348
6. Mount Pleasant 2.3% 22.4% (-20.0)#6 18.1% (-15.7)#454
7. North Myrtle Beach 2.5% 22.4% (-19.9)#7 18.1% (-15.6)#498
8. Central 3.4% 22.4% (-18.9)#8 18.1% (-14.6)#885
9. Due West 3.4% 22.4% (-18.9)#9 18.1% (-14.6)#891
10. Goose Creek 4.0% 22.4% (-18.4)#10 18.1% (-14.0)#1,140
11. Moncks Corner 4.1% 22.4% (-18.3)#11 18.1% (-14.0)#1,164
12. Bluffton 4.1% 22.4% (-18.2)#12 18.1% (-13.9)#1,179
13. Forestbrook 4.2% 22.4% (-18.1)#13 18.1% (-13.8)#1,225
14. Joanna 4.3% 22.4% (-18.1)#14 18.1% (-13.8)#1,237
15. Watts Mills 4.3% 22.4% (-18.0)#15 18.1% (-13.7)#1,269
16. Chapin 4.6% 22.4% (-17.8)#16 18.1% (-13.4)#1,387
17. Wilkinson Heights 5.5% 22.4% (-16.9)#17 18.1% (-12.6)#1,783
18. Whitmire 5.6% 22.4% (-16.8)#18 18.1% (-12.5)#1,803
19. Boiling Springs 5.8% 22.4% (-16.5)#19 18.1% (-12.2)#1,924
20. Carolina Forest 6.6% 22.4% (-15.8)#20 18.1% (-11.5)#2,217
21. East Sumter 7.1% 22.4% (-15.3)#21 18.1% (-11.0)#2,446
22. Loris 7.2% 22.4% (-15.1)#22 18.1% (-10.8)#2,517
23. Welcome 7.2% 22.4% (-15.1)#23 18.1% (-10.8)#2,522
24. Wellford 7.6% 22.4% (-14.8)#24 18.1% (-10.5)#2,671
25. Pacolet 7.8% 22.4% (-14.6)#25 18.1% (-10.3)#2,771
26. Sangaree 8.0% 22.4% (-14.4)#26 18.1% (-10.1)#2,820
27. Lake Secession 8.0% 22.4% (-14.4)#27 18.1% (-10.1)#2,831
28. Capitol View 8.9% 22.4% (-13.5)#28 18.1% (-9.20)#3,191
29. Fort Lawn 9.2% 22.4% (-13.1)#29 18.1% (-8.83)#3,364
30. Lexington 9.5% 22.4% (-12.9)#30 18.1% (-8.55)#3,459
31. Cameron 9.5% 22.4% (-12.8)#31 18.1% (-8.54)#3,482
32. Irmo 9.8% 22.4% (-12.6)#32 18.1% (-8.29)#3,572
33. Taylors 10.0% 22.4% (-12.3)#33 18.1% (-8.03)#3,683
34. Jonesville 10.5% 22.4% (-11.8)#34 18.1% (-7.54)#3,872
35. Jackson 10.7% 22.4% (-11.6)#35 18.1% (-7.32)#3,957
36. Socastee 10.8% 22.4% (-11.6)#36 18.1% (-7.24)#3,979
37. Manning 11.1% 22.4% (-11.3)#37 18.1% (-6.95)#4,069
38. Seven Oaks 11.2% 22.4% (-11.2)#38 18.1% (-6.89)#4,143
39. Baxter 11.6% 22.4% (-10.8)#39 18.1% (-6.49)#4,290
40. Lane 11.8% 22.4% (-10.6)#40 18.1% (-6.30)#4,365
41. Greeleyville 11.8% 22.4% (-10.6)#41 18.1% (-6.30)#4,371
42. Jefferson 11.9% 22.4% (-10.5)#42 18.1% (-6.20)#4,405
43. Little River 12.1% 22.4% (-10.3)#43 18.1% (-5.99)#4,482
44. Great Falls 12.1% 22.4% (-10.3)#44 18.1% (-5.97)#4,491
45. Williston 12.4% 22.4% (-10.0)#45 18.1% (-5.70)#4,569
46. Simpsonville 13.0% 22.4% (-9.40)#46 18.1% (-5.09)#4,830
47. Beech Island 13.3% 22.4% (-9.04)#47 18.1% (-4.73)#4,948
48. Charleston 13.6% 22.4% (-8.81)#48 18.1% (-4.50)#5,040
49. Forest Acres 13.9% 22.4% (-8.45)#49 18.1% (-4.14)#5,181
50. Centerville 14.0% 22.4% (-8.39)#50 18.1% (-4.08)#5,209
51. Summerville 14.0% 22.4% (-8.32)#51 18.1% (-4.01)#5,235
52. Yemassee 14.3% 22.4% (-8.09)#52 18.1% (-3.78)#5,319
53. Duncan 14.9% 22.4% (-7.46)#53 18.1% (-3.15)#5,551
54. Easley 15.3% 22.4% (-7.12)#54 18.1% (-2.81)#5,664
55. South Congaree 15.3% 22.4% (-7.04)#55 18.1% (-2.73)#5,692
56. Aynor 15.4% 22.4% (-6.99)#56 18.1% (-2.68)#5,715
57. Elliott 15.4% 22.4% (-6.99)#57 18.1% (-2.68)#5,730
58. Cordova 15.4% 22.4% (-6.99)#58 18.1% (-2.68)#5,749
59. Pelzer 15.6% 22.4% (-6.82)#59 18.1% (-2.51)#5,788
60. Hardeeville 15.8% 22.4% (-6.58)#60 18.1% (-2.27)#5,852
61. Greer 15.9% 22.4% (-6.44)#61 18.1% (-2.13)#5,909
62. Ladson 16.0% 22.4% (-6.36)#62 18.1% (-2.05)#5,943
63. Kershaw 16.1% 22.4% (-6.27)#63 18.1% (-1.96)#5,969
64. Gaffney 16.3% 22.4% (-6.03)#64 18.1% (-1.72)#6,040
65. Wade Hampton 16.6% 22.4% (-5.78)#65 18.1% (-1.47)#6,118
66. Clearwater 16.7% 22.4% (-5.71)#66 18.1% (-1.40)#6,135
67. White Knoll 17.2% 22.4% (-5.17)#67 18.1% (-0.856)#6,344
68. Elgin 17.3% 22.4% (-5.09)#68 18.1% (-0.779)#6,363
69. Hampton 17.3% 22.4% (-5.04)#69 18.1% (-0.729)#6,379
70. Fountain Inn 17.4% 22.4% (-5.01)#70 18.1% (-0.704)#6,386
71. Pageland 17.4% 22.4% (-5.00)#71 18.1% (-0.687)#6,392
72. Iva 17.6% 22.4% (-4.73)#72 18.1% (-0.416)#6,488
73. Port Royal 18.0% 22.4% (-4.39)#73 18.1% (-0.076)#6,613
74. Mauldin 18.2% 22.4% (-4.19)#74 18.1% (+0.119)#6,650
75. Lugoff 18.8% 22.4% (-3.57)#75 18.1% (+0.744)#6,890
76. West Columbia 18.9% 22.4% (-3.50)#76 18.1% (+0.807)#6,906
77. Dunean 19.0% 22.4% (-3.36)#77 18.1% (+0.951)#6,938
78. Woodruff 19.2% 22.4% (-3.12)#78 18.1% (+1.19)#7,017
79. Holly Hill 19.4% 22.4% (-2.97)#79 18.1% (+1.34)#7,066
80. Powdersville 19.6% 22.4% (-2.79)#80 18.1% (+1.52)#7,126
81. Calhoun Falls 19.6% 22.4% (-2.78)#81 18.1% (+1.53)#7,135
82. Reevesville 20.0% 22.4% (-2.37)#82 18.1% (+1.94)#7,284
83. Silverstreet 20.0% 22.4% (-2.37)#83 18.1% (+1.94)#7,306
84. Kingstree 20.1% 22.4% (-2.29)#84 18.1% (+2.02)#7,321
85. Laurel Bay 20.6% 22.4% (-1.77)#85 18.1% (+2.54)#7,457
86. Hilton Head Island 21.1% 22.4% (-1.30)#86 18.1% (+3.01)#7,591
87. Heath Springs 21.2% 22.4% (-1.16)#87 18.1% (+3.15)#7,630
88. Springdale 21.3% 22.4% (-1.02)#88 18.1% (+3.29)#7,671
89. Reidville 21.6% 22.4% (-0.751)#89 18.1% (+3.56)#7,770
90. Chester 21.7% 22.4% (-0.719)#90 18.1% (+3.59)#7,783
91. Camp Croft 21.7% 22.4% (-0.706)#91 18.1% (+3.60)#7,785
92. Pelion 22.0% 22.4% (-0.394)#92 18.1% (+3.92)#7,894
93. Ninety Six 22.1% 22.4% (-0.313)#93 18.1% (+4.00)#7,915
94. Windsor 22.2% 22.4% (-0.150)#94 18.1% (+4.16)#7,974
95. Shell Point 22.3% 22.4% (-0.042)#95 18.1% (+4.27)#8,002
96. Rock Hill 22.5% 22.4% (+0.157)#96 18.1% (+4.47)#8,063
97. Bishopville 22.6% 22.4% (+0.208)#97 18.1% (+4.52)#8,082
98. Sans Souci 22.6% 22.4% (+0.235)#98 18.1% (+4.54)#8,092
99. Wyboo 22.7% 22.4% (+0.294)#99 18.1% (+4.60)#8,109
100. New Ellenton 22.7% 22.4% (+0.355)#100 18.1% (+4.66)#8,125

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Carolina are:
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Carolina?
James Island has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Carolina with 0.95%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the State of South Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in South Carolina is 22.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States is 18.1%.