Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in South Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in South Carolina

City Poverty vs State vs National
1. Willington 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#1 12.5% (+87.5)#33
2. Coronaca 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#2 12.5% (+87.5)#63
3. Cross Anchor 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#3 12.5% (+87.5)#74
4. Coosawhatchie 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#4 12.5% (+87.5)#101
5. Fingerville 79.8% 14.4% (+65.4)#5 12.5% (+67.3)#198
6. Olympia 74.6% 14.4% (+60.2)#6 12.5% (+62.0)#245
7. Clemson University 73.8% 14.4% (+59.5)#7 12.5% (+61.3)#253
8. Bradley 66.9% 14.4% (+52.5)#8 12.5% (+54.3)#358
9. Oswego 64.5% 14.4% (+50.1)#9 12.5% (+52.0)#405
10. Little Rock 62.3% 14.4% (+47.9)#10 12.5% (+49.8)#456
11. Sellers 61.7% 14.4% (+47.3)#11 12.5% (+49.1)#474
12. Arthurtown 60.7% 14.4% (+46.3)#12 12.5% (+48.1)#499
13. Lynchburg 60.3% 14.4% (+46.0)#13 12.5% (+47.8)#506
14. Alcolu 55.1% 14.4% (+40.7)#14 12.5% (+42.5)#662
15. Jenkinsville 51.9% 14.4% (+37.5)#15 12.5% (+39.3)#805
16. Saxon 48.7% 14.4% (+34.3)#16 12.5% (+36.2)#987
17. Dovesville 48.6% 14.4% (+34.3)#17 12.5% (+36.1)#993
18. Ware Shoals 48.0% 14.4% (+33.7)#18 12.5% (+35.5)#1,026
19. City View 47.5% 14.4% (+33.2)#19 12.5% (+35.0)#1,056
20. Cash 47.0% 14.4% (+32.7)#20 12.5% (+34.5)#1,094
21. Williams 46.8% 14.4% (+32.4)#21 12.5% (+34.3)#1,107
22. Daviston 46.7% 14.4% (+32.4)#22 12.5% (+34.2)#1,111
23. Centenary 46.7% 14.4% (+32.3)#23 12.5% (+34.1)#1,124
24. Southern Shops 45.3% 14.4% (+30.9)#24 12.5% (+32.8)#1,229
25. Judson 44.8% 14.4% (+30.4)#25 12.5% (+32.2)#1,267
26. Waterloo 44.7% 14.4% (+30.3)#26 12.5% (+32.1)#1,273
27. Allendale 43.3% 14.4% (+29.0)#27 12.5% (+30.8)#1,385
28. Zion 43.1% 14.4% (+28.8)#28 12.5% (+30.6)#1,401
29. Clifton 42.3% 14.4% (+28.0)#29 12.5% (+29.8)#1,477
30. Atlantic Beach 41.6% 14.4% (+27.2)#30 12.5% (+29.0)#1,559
31. Enoree 41.5% 14.4% (+27.1)#31 12.5% (+29.0)#1,562
32. Irwin 41.1% 14.4% (+26.8)#32 12.5% (+28.6)#1,591
33. Clarks Hill 41.0% 14.4% (+26.7)#33 12.5% (+28.5)#1,598
34. St Matthews 40.2% 14.4% (+25.8)#34 12.5% (+27.6)#1,665
35. Saluda 40.1% 14.4% (+25.7)#35 12.5% (+27.5)#1,675
36. Holly Hill 40.0% 14.4% (+25.7)#36 12.5% (+27.5)#1,679
37. Bamberg 39.7% 14.4% (+25.3)#37 12.5% (+27.1)#1,721
38. Dillon 39.6% 14.4% (+25.2)#38 12.5% (+27.0)#1,733
39. Ridgeway 39.4% 14.4% (+25.1)#39 12.5% (+26.9)#1,749
40. St Stephen 39.2% 14.4% (+24.9)#40 12.5% (+26.7)#1,773
41. Timmonsville 38.9% 14.4% (+24.5)#41 12.5% (+26.4)#1,805
42. Bonneau 38.5% 14.4% (+24.1)#42 12.5% (+26.0)#1,847
43. North 38.4% 14.4% (+24.1)#43 12.5% (+25.9)#1,853
44. Drayton 38.4% 14.4% (+24.1)#44 12.5% (+25.9)#1,854
45. Eureka Mill 38.1% 14.4% (+23.7)#45 12.5% (+25.5)#1,902
46. Buffalo 38.0% 14.4% (+23.6)#46 12.5% (+25.4)#1,912
47. Eastover 37.6% 14.4% (+23.2)#47 12.5% (+25.0)#1,968
48. Lobeco 37.2% 14.4% (+22.9)#48 12.5% (+24.7)#2,016
49. Salley 37.0% 14.4% (+22.7)#49 12.5% (+24.5)#2,054
50. Hamer 36.6% 14.4% (+22.2)#50 12.5% (+24.0)#2,124
51. St George 36.6% 14.4% (+22.2)#51 12.5% (+24.0)#2,127
52. Clemson 36.0% 14.4% (+21.7)#52 12.5% (+23.5)#2,187
53. Barnwell 35.9% 14.4% (+21.6)#53 12.5% (+23.4)#2,210
54. Springfield 35.9% 14.4% (+21.5)#54 12.5% (+23.4)#2,218
55. Andrews 35.5% 14.4% (+21.2)#55 12.5% (+23.0)#2,278
56. Bowman 35.4% 14.4% (+21.1)#56 12.5% (+22.9)#2,300
57. Arcadia 35.3% 14.4% (+20.9)#57 12.5% (+22.7)#2,320
58. Antreville 35.0% 14.4% (+20.6)#58 12.5% (+22.4)#2,361
59. Estill 34.8% 14.4% (+20.5)#59 12.5% (+22.3)#2,383
60. Perry 34.7% 14.4% (+20.4)#60 12.5% (+22.2)#2,398
61. Modoc 34.7% 14.4% (+20.3)#61 12.5% (+22.1)#2,405
62. Great Falls 34.6% 14.4% (+20.2)#62 12.5% (+22.0)#2,422
63. Central 34.3% 14.4% (+20.0)#63 12.5% (+21.8)#2,465
64. Homeland Park 34.2% 14.4% (+19.9)#64 12.5% (+21.7)#2,483
65. Orangeburg 34.0% 14.4% (+19.7)#65 12.5% (+21.5)#2,531
66. Wilkinson Heights 33.9% 14.4% (+19.5)#66 12.5% (+21.3)#2,554
67. Iva 33.9% 14.4% (+19.5)#67 12.5% (+21.3)#2,561
68. Cheraw 33.8% 14.4% (+19.4)#68 12.5% (+21.2)#2,577
69. Bethune 33.7% 14.4% (+19.4)#69 12.5% (+21.2)#2,588
70. Cowpens 33.6% 14.4% (+19.3)#70 12.5% (+21.1)#2,608
71. Walhalla 33.5% 14.4% (+19.2)#71 12.5% (+21.0)#2,628
72. Pamplico 33.5% 14.4% (+19.1)#72 12.5% (+20.9)#2,638
73. Brookdale 33.4% 14.4% (+19.0)#73 12.5% (+20.8)#2,645
74. Blenheim 33.3% 14.4% (+19.0)#74 12.5% (+20.8)#2,664
75. Unity 32.9% 14.4% (+18.5)#75 12.5% (+20.3)#2,760
76. Johnston 32.4% 14.4% (+18.0)#76 12.5% (+19.8)#2,866
77. Lake View 32.4% 14.4% (+18.0)#77 12.5% (+19.8)#2,872
78. Adams Run 31.8% 14.4% (+17.4)#78 12.5% (+19.2)#3,008
79. Lancaster 31.6% 14.4% (+17.2)#79 12.5% (+19.0)#3,068
80. Blacksburg 31.5% 14.4% (+17.2)#80 12.5% (+19.0)#3,076
81. Harleyville 31.3% 14.4% (+16.9)#81 12.5% (+18.7)#3,122
82. Hodges 31.2% 14.4% (+16.9)#82 12.5% (+18.7)#3,138
83. Darlington 30.9% 14.4% (+16.5)#83 12.5% (+18.4)#3,207
84. Watts Mills 30.7% 14.4% (+16.4)#84 12.5% (+18.2)#3,249
85. Marion 30.7% 14.4% (+16.3)#85 12.5% (+18.2)#3,251
86. Grover 30.6% 14.4% (+16.2)#86 12.5% (+18.0)#3,282
87. Patrick 30.4% 14.4% (+16.0)#87 12.5% (+17.9)#3,317
88. Langley 30.2% 14.4% (+15.8)#88 12.5% (+17.6)#3,368
89. Ward 30.2% 14.4% (+15.8)#89 12.5% (+17.6)#3,372
90. Homewood 30.1% 14.4% (+15.7)#90 12.5% (+17.5)#3,391
91. Graniteville 29.8% 14.4% (+15.5)#91 12.5% (+17.3)#3,440
92. Abbeville 29.7% 14.4% (+15.4)#92 12.5% (+17.2)#3,463
93. Edgefield 29.7% 14.4% (+15.4)#93 12.5% (+17.2)#3,464
94. Fair Play 29.6% 14.4% (+15.3)#94 12.5% (+17.1)#3,489
95. Rains 29.6% 14.4% (+15.2)#95 12.5% (+17.1)#3,496
96. Denmark 29.6% 14.4% (+15.2)#96 12.5% (+17.0)#3,506
97. Santee 29.5% 14.4% (+15.1)#97 12.5% (+17.0)#3,532
98. Gantt 29.4% 14.4% (+15.0)#98 12.5% (+16.8)#3,573
99. Kingstree 29.2% 14.4% (+14.9)#99 12.5% (+16.7)#3,606
100. Parker 29.2% 14.4% (+14.8)#100 12.5% (+16.7)#3,616

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in South Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
79.8%
#5
66.9%
#6
64.5%
#7
61.7%
#8
60.3%
#9
55.1%
#10
51.9%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level in South Carolina?
Willington has the Highest Poverty Level in South Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level in the State of South Carolina?
Poverty Level in South Carolina is 14.4%.
What is the Poverty Level in the United States?
Poverty Level in the United States is 12.5%.