Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Physical and Health Sciences
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in South Carolina

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in South Carolina

City % Graduates vs State vs National
1. Clifton 50.0% 2.9% (+47.1)#1 3.1% (+46.9)#80
2. Mayo 31.9% 2.9% (+29.0)#2 3.1% (+28.8)#228
3. Troy 30.8% 2.9% (+27.8)#3 3.1% (+27.7)#243
4. Seabrook 27.3% 2.9% (+24.3)#4 3.1% (+24.2)#312
5. Kingstree 24.7% 2.9% (+21.8)#5 3.1% (+21.6)#398
6. Society Hill 24.5% 2.9% (+21.6)#6 3.1% (+21.4)#405
7. Iva 24.4% 2.9% (+21.4)#7 3.1% (+21.3)#408
8. Cherryvale 22.9% 2.9% (+20.0)#8 3.1% (+19.8)#442
9. Lakewood 22.4% 2.9% (+19.5)#9 3.1% (+19.3)#456
10. North Hartsville 21.0% 2.9% (+18.1)#10 3.1% (+17.9)#506
11. Ward 20.0% 2.9% (+17.1)#11 3.1% (+16.9)#542
12. Ehrhardt 19.7% 2.9% (+16.7)#12 3.1% (+16.6)#565
13. Arcadia 19.2% 2.9% (+16.2)#13 3.1% (+16.1)#586
14. Mccormick 17.4% 2.9% (+14.5)#14 3.1% (+14.3)#672
15. Sharon 17.4% 2.9% (+14.5)#15 3.1% (+14.3)#678
16. Scranton 16.7% 2.9% (+13.7)#16 3.1% (+13.6)#716
17. Modoc 13.5% 2.9% (+10.6)#17 3.1% (+10.4)#1,035
18. Estill 13.0% 2.9% (+10.0)#18 3.1% (+9.88)#1,106
19. Ulmer 12.8% 2.9% (+9.89)#19 3.1% (+9.72)#1,126
20. Kiawah Island 11.1% 2.9% (+8.18)#20 3.1% (+8.01)#1,345
21. Eureka Mill 11.0% 2.9% (+8.04)#21 3.1% (+7.88)#1,378
22. Stateburg 10.4% 2.9% (+7.47)#22 3.1% (+7.31)#1,497
23. Lake City 10.4% 2.9% (+7.47)#23 3.1% (+7.31)#1,498
24. Barnwell 10.3% 2.9% (+7.41)#24 3.1% (+7.25)#1,506
25. Murphys Estates 9.9% 2.9% (+7.01)#25 3.1% (+6.84)#1,630
26. Debordieu Colony 9.9% 2.9% (+6.97)#26 3.1% (+6.81)#1,636
27. Hilltop 9.9% 2.9% (+6.93)#27 3.1% (+6.77)#1,641
28. Great Falls 9.3% 2.9% (+6.35)#28 3.1% (+6.19)#1,789
29. Eutawville 9.1% 2.9% (+6.16)#29 3.1% (+5.99)#1,849
30. Arial 9.0% 2.9% (+6.02)#30 3.1% (+5.86)#1,902
31. Georgetown 8.9% 2.9% (+5.97)#31 3.1% (+5.81)#1,917
32. York 8.8% 2.9% (+5.83)#32 3.1% (+5.67)#1,961
33. Slater Marietta 8.3% 2.9% (+5.37)#33 3.1% (+5.21)#2,130
34. Due West 7.8% 2.9% (+4.84)#34 3.1% (+4.68)#2,335
35. Fripp Island 7.7% 2.9% (+4.74)#35 3.1% (+4.58)#2,396
36. Wedgefield 7.6% 2.9% (+4.63)#36 3.1% (+4.46)#2,444
37. Easley 7.5% 2.9% (+4.54)#37 3.1% (+4.37)#2,486
38. Holly Hill 7.4% 2.9% (+4.47)#38 3.1% (+4.31)#2,517
39. Mullins 7.3% 2.9% (+4.33)#39 3.1% (+4.17)#2,607
40. Loris 7.3% 2.9% (+4.32)#40 3.1% (+4.15)#2,615
41. Starr 6.9% 2.9% (+3.96)#41 3.1% (+3.80)#2,847
42. Cottageville 6.9% 2.9% (+3.93)#42 3.1% (+3.76)#2,870
43. Hollywood 6.8% 2.9% (+3.91)#43 3.1% (+3.75)#2,887
44. Gloverville 6.7% 2.9% (+3.78)#44 3.1% (+3.62)#2,953
45. Donalds 6.7% 2.9% (+3.73)#45 3.1% (+3.57)#2,992
46. Allendale 6.6% 2.9% (+3.66)#46 3.1% (+3.50)#3,027
47. Hampton 6.4% 2.9% (+3.44)#47 3.1% (+3.27)#3,177
48. Murrells Inlet 6.2% 2.9% (+3.29)#48 3.1% (+3.12)#3,294
49. The Cliffs Valley 6.1% 2.9% (+3.15)#49 3.1% (+2.99)#3,385
50. Greer 5.8% 2.9% (+2.89)#50 3.1% (+2.73)#3,609
51. Awendaw 5.8% 2.9% (+2.87)#51 3.1% (+2.70)#3,632
52. Union 5.8% 2.9% (+2.84)#52 3.1% (+2.67)#3,653
53. Carolina Forest 5.7% 2.9% (+2.75)#53 3.1% (+2.58)#3,729
54. Andrews 5.7% 2.9% (+2.74)#54 3.1% (+2.58)#3,732
55. Woodfield 5.7% 2.9% (+2.72)#55 3.1% (+2.55)#3,752
56. Berea 5.6% 2.9% (+2.64)#56 3.1% (+2.47)#3,818
57. Manning 5.5% 2.9% (+2.56)#57 3.1% (+2.39)#3,900
58. North Myrtle Beach 5.5% 2.9% (+2.54)#58 3.1% (+2.37)#3,925
59. Northlake 5.4% 2.9% (+2.48)#59 3.1% (+2.31)#3,983
60. Pinopolis 5.4% 2.9% (+2.44)#60 3.1% (+2.28)#4,023
61. Quinby 5.4% 2.9% (+2.42)#61 3.1% (+2.26)#4,045
62. Jackson 5.3% 2.9% (+2.39)#62 3.1% (+2.23)#4,078
63. Cross Hill 5.3% 2.9% (+2.33)#63 3.1% (+2.16)#4,149
64. Johnston 5.2% 2.9% (+2.27)#64 3.1% (+2.11)#4,214
65. Pine Ridge 5.1% 2.9% (+2.19)#65 3.1% (+2.03)#4,302
66. Ladson 5.1% 2.9% (+2.14)#66 3.1% (+1.97)#4,374
67. Kershaw 4.9% 2.9% (+2.01)#67 3.1% (+1.85)#4,509
68. Dunean 4.9% 2.9% (+2.00)#68 3.1% (+1.83)#4,529
69. South Sumter 4.8% 2.9% (+1.91)#69 3.1% (+1.75)#4,650
70. Six Mile 4.7% 2.9% (+1.76)#70 3.1% (+1.60)#4,853
71. Chickasaw Point 4.6% 2.9% (+1.65)#71 3.1% (+1.49)#5,008
72. Simpsonville 4.6% 2.9% (+1.62)#72 3.1% (+1.45)#5,048
73. Ninety Six 4.5% 2.9% (+1.61)#73 3.1% (+1.45)#5,067
74. Hilton Head Island 4.5% 2.9% (+1.60)#74 3.1% (+1.43)#5,109
75. Cayce 4.4% 2.9% (+1.47)#75 3.1% (+1.31)#5,297
76. Clemson 4.3% 2.9% (+1.38)#76 3.1% (+1.21)#5,456
77. West Columbia 4.2% 2.9% (+1.24)#77 3.1% (+1.07)#5,655
78. Burton 4.1% 2.9% (+1.20)#78 3.1% (+1.04)#5,729
79. Lesslie 4.1% 2.9% (+1.13)#79 3.1% (+0.963)#5,854
80. Centerville 4.1% 2.9% (+1.13)#80 3.1% (+0.962)#5,855
81. Aiken 4.1% 2.9% (+1.12)#81 3.1% (+0.959)#5,859
82. Myrtle Beach 4.0% 2.9% (+1.08)#82 3.1% (+0.915)#5,940
83. Sumter 4.0% 2.9% (+1.07)#83 3.1% (+0.904)#5,953
84. Perry 4.0% 2.9% (+1.07)#84 3.1% (+0.900)#5,983
85. Briarcliffe Acres 3.9% 2.9% (+1.01)#85 3.1% (+0.848)#6,088
86. Abbeville 3.9% 2.9% (+0.936)#86 3.1% (+0.771)#6,231
87. Lamar 3.8% 2.9% (+0.857)#87 3.1% (+0.692)#6,392
88. Lake Secession 3.8% 2.9% (+0.839)#88 3.1% (+0.674)#6,432
89. Baxter 3.7% 2.9% (+0.774)#89 3.1% (+0.609)#6,550
90. New Ellenton 3.7% 2.9% (+0.769)#90 3.1% (+0.604)#6,560
91. North Augusta 3.6% 2.9% (+0.665)#91 3.1% (+0.500)#6,791
92. Mcbee 3.6% 2.9% (+0.662)#92 3.1% (+0.497)#6,797
93. Isle Of Palms 3.5% 2.9% (+0.582)#93 3.1% (+0.417)#6,989
94. Summit 3.5% 2.9% (+0.574)#94 3.1% (+0.409)#7,007
95. Rock Hill 3.4% 2.9% (+0.512)#95 3.1% (+0.348)#7,166
96. Dentsville 3.4% 2.9% (+0.434)#96 3.1% (+0.269)#7,350
97. Ravenel 3.4% 2.9% (+0.423)#97 3.1% (+0.258)#7,373
98. Columbia 3.3% 2.9% (+0.412)#98 3.1% (+0.247)#7,398
99. Branchville 3.3% 2.9% (+0.398)#99 3.1% (+0.234)#7,433
100. Ben Avon 3.3% 2.9% (+0.386)#100 3.1% (+0.221)#7,473

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in South Carolina are:
#1
50.0%
#2
31.9%
#3
30.8%
#4
24.7%
#5
24.5%
#6
24.4%
#7
22.9%
#8
22.4%
#9
21.0%
#10
20.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in South Carolina?
Clifton has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in South Carolina with 50.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the State of South Carolina?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in South Carolina is 2.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States is 3.1%.