Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Transportation
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in South Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in South Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Cope 81.8% 3.7% (+78.1)#1 3.8% (+78.0)#28
2. Ashwood 43.3% 3.7% (+39.6)#2 3.8% (+39.5)#146
3. Sheldon 38.3% 3.7% (+34.5)#3 3.8% (+34.4)#187
4. Scotia 36.4% 3.7% (+32.7)#4 3.8% (+32.5)#216
5. Ulmer 33.3% 3.7% (+29.6)#5 3.8% (+29.5)#274
6. Promised Land 32.6% 3.7% (+28.9)#6 3.8% (+28.8)#295
7. Ware Place 30.6% 3.7% (+26.9)#7 3.8% (+26.8)#321
8. Princeton 26.4% 3.7% (+22.7)#8 3.8% (+22.6)#439
9. Seabrook 22.8% 3.7% (+19.1)#9 3.8% (+19.0)#596
10. Boykin 21.6% 3.7% (+17.9)#10 3.8% (+17.8)#671
11. Lane 21.3% 3.7% (+17.6)#11 3.8% (+17.5)#693
12. Keowee Key 20.8% 3.7% (+17.1)#12 3.8% (+17.0)#725
13. Bucksport 20.8% 3.7% (+17.1)#13 3.8% (+17.0)#733
14. Furman 20.7% 3.7% (+17.0)#14 3.8% (+16.9)#736
15. Smyrna 20.0% 3.7% (+16.3)#15 3.8% (+16.2)#808
16. Mayesville 19.4% 3.7% (+15.7)#16 3.8% (+15.6)#847
17. Mount Carmel 18.9% 3.7% (+15.2)#17 3.8% (+15.1)#888
18. Little Rock 18.8% 3.7% (+15.0)#18 3.8% (+14.9)#896
19. Allendale 18.3% 3.7% (+14.5)#19 3.8% (+14.4)#968
20. Centenary 17.8% 3.7% (+14.1)#20 3.8% (+14.0)#1,030
21. Gadsden 17.6% 3.7% (+13.9)#21 3.8% (+13.8)#1,050
22. Utica 17.5% 3.7% (+13.8)#22 3.8% (+13.7)#1,060
23. Eastover 17.2% 3.7% (+13.5)#23 3.8% (+13.4)#1,094
24. Oakland 15.5% 3.7% (+11.8)#24 3.8% (+11.7)#1,328
25. East Sumter 15.4% 3.7% (+11.7)#25 3.8% (+11.6)#1,342
26. Holly Hill 15.3% 3.7% (+11.6)#26 3.8% (+11.5)#1,372
27. Scranton 15.0% 3.7% (+11.2)#27 3.8% (+11.1)#1,438
28. North 14.5% 3.7% (+10.8)#28 3.8% (+10.7)#1,540
29. Lincolnville 14.4% 3.7% (+10.7)#29 3.8% (+10.6)#1,553
30. Pinewood 14.3% 3.7% (+10.6)#30 3.8% (+10.5)#1,559
31. Cokesbury 14.2% 3.7% (+10.5)#31 3.8% (+10.4)#1,597
32. Inman Mills 13.8% 3.7% (+10.1)#32 3.8% (+9.99)#1,680
33. Marion 13.0% 3.7% (+9.28)#33 3.8% (+9.17)#1,893
34. Lesslie 12.8% 3.7% (+9.06)#34 3.8% (+8.95)#1,966
35. Buffalo 12.5% 3.7% (+8.82)#35 3.8% (+8.71)#2,033
36. Hilda 12.1% 3.7% (+8.37)#36 3.8% (+8.26)#2,197
37. Cordova 11.9% 3.7% (+8.19)#37 3.8% (+8.09)#2,265
38. Edisto 11.8% 3.7% (+8.13)#38 3.8% (+8.02)#2,293
39. Hamer 11.5% 3.7% (+7.76)#39 3.8% (+7.65)#2,441
40. Sandy Springs 11.4% 3.7% (+7.72)#40 3.8% (+7.61)#2,454
41. Eutawville 11.4% 3.7% (+7.65)#41 3.8% (+7.55)#2,486
42. Adams Run 11.2% 3.7% (+7.45)#42 3.8% (+7.34)#2,565
43. Yemassee 10.7% 3.7% (+7.03)#43 3.8% (+6.92)#2,738
44. Cash 10.5% 3.7% (+6.82)#44 3.8% (+6.71)#2,829
45. Lynchburg 10.5% 3.7% (+6.82)#45 3.8% (+6.71)#2,833
46. Lamar 10.4% 3.7% (+6.71)#46 3.8% (+6.60)#2,884
47. Monarch Mill 10.3% 3.7% (+6.54)#47 3.8% (+6.44)#2,992
48. Dale 9.9% 3.7% (+6.22)#48 3.8% (+6.12)#3,167
49. Fair Play 9.9% 3.7% (+6.15)#49 3.8% (+6.04)#3,212
50. Blacksburg 9.7% 3.7% (+5.98)#50 3.8% (+5.88)#3,319
51. Bowman 9.7% 3.7% (+5.98)#51 3.8% (+5.88)#3,320
52. Greeleyville 9.7% 3.7% (+5.94)#52 3.8% (+5.84)#3,339
53. Lakewood 9.6% 3.7% (+5.88)#53 3.8% (+5.77)#3,392
54. Ridgeville 9.4% 3.7% (+5.65)#54 3.8% (+5.54)#3,538
55. Honea Path 9.0% 3.7% (+5.27)#55 3.8% (+5.17)#3,839
56. Dunbar 8.9% 3.7% (+5.18)#56 3.8% (+5.08)#3,904
57. Sangaree 8.8% 3.7% (+5.05)#57 3.8% (+4.94)#4,020
58. Mullins 8.7% 3.7% (+5.03)#58 3.8% (+4.92)#4,043
59. Conestee 8.5% 3.7% (+4.83)#59 3.8% (+4.72)#4,227
60. Carlisle 8.4% 3.7% (+4.72)#60 3.8% (+4.62)#4,322
61. Gayle Mill 8.4% 3.7% (+4.70)#61 3.8% (+4.59)#4,352
62. Estill 8.3% 3.7% (+4.63)#62 3.8% (+4.53)#4,406
63. Hickory Grove 8.1% 3.7% (+4.34)#63 3.8% (+4.23)#4,716
64. Harleyville 8.0% 3.7% (+4.31)#64 3.8% (+4.20)#4,743
65. Perry 8.0% 3.7% (+4.25)#65 3.8% (+4.15)#4,795
66. Elloree 7.9% 3.7% (+4.20)#66 3.8% (+4.09)#4,845
67. Vance 7.8% 3.7% (+4.13)#67 3.8% (+4.03)#4,911
68. Stuckey 7.8% 3.7% (+4.11)#68 3.8% (+4.01)#4,932
69. Boiling Springs 7.8% 3.7% (+4.04)#69 3.8% (+3.94)#5,013
70. Hampton 7.7% 3.7% (+4.01)#70 3.8% (+3.90)#5,050
71. Eureka Mill 7.6% 3.7% (+3.91)#71 3.8% (+3.80)#5,181
72. Timmonsville 7.6% 3.7% (+3.85)#72 3.8% (+3.74)#5,245
73. Andrews 7.4% 3.7% (+3.73)#73 3.8% (+3.62)#5,384
74. Rowesville 7.4% 3.7% (+3.72)#74 3.8% (+3.62)#5,394
75. Jacksonboro 7.4% 3.7% (+3.70)#75 3.8% (+3.59)#5,431
76. Dillon 7.4% 3.7% (+3.68)#76 3.8% (+3.57)#5,463
77. Dentsville 7.3% 3.7% (+3.57)#77 3.8% (+3.47)#5,592
78. Lugoff 7.3% 3.7% (+3.57)#78 3.8% (+3.46)#5,596
79. Quinby 7.3% 3.7% (+3.57)#79 3.8% (+3.46)#5,598
80. Ladson 7.1% 3.7% (+3.44)#80 3.8% (+3.33)#5,752
81. Ware Shoals 7.1% 3.7% (+3.41)#81 3.8% (+3.30)#5,826
82. Denmark 7.0% 3.7% (+3.32)#82 3.8% (+3.22)#5,927
83. Gifford 7.0% 3.7% (+3.27)#83 3.8% (+3.16)#5,991
84. Dovesville 7.0% 3.7% (+3.26)#84 3.8% (+3.15)#6,005
85. Barnwell 6.9% 3.7% (+3.19)#85 3.8% (+3.09)#6,101
86. Little River 6.9% 3.7% (+3.17)#86 3.8% (+3.06)#6,149
87. Manning 6.9% 3.7% (+3.15)#87 3.8% (+3.05)#6,164
88. Joanna 6.9% 3.7% (+3.15)#88 3.8% (+3.04)#6,177
89. Monetta 6.8% 3.7% (+3.11)#89 3.8% (+3.00)#6,244
90. Newtown 6.8% 3.7% (+3.04)#90 3.8% (+2.93)#6,336
91. Cottageville 6.7% 3.7% (+3.00)#91 3.8% (+2.90)#6,395
92. Springdale 6.6% 3.7% (+2.89)#92 3.8% (+2.78)#6,581
93. York 6.5% 3.7% (+2.79)#93 3.8% (+2.69)#6,720
94. Whitmire 6.5% 3.7% (+2.78)#94 3.8% (+2.68)#6,729
95. Chickasaw Point 6.5% 3.7% (+2.78)#95 3.8% (+2.67)#6,744
96. Gantt 6.5% 3.7% (+2.77)#96 3.8% (+2.66)#6,760
97. Ninety Six 6.4% 3.7% (+2.71)#97 3.8% (+2.61)#6,846
98. Atlantic Beach 6.4% 3.7% (+2.68)#98 3.8% (+2.58)#6,890
99. Jefferson 6.4% 3.7% (+2.64)#99 3.8% (+2.54)#6,966
100. Troy 6.3% 3.7% (+2.64)#100 3.8% (+2.53)#6,983

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in South Carolina are:
#1
81.8%
#2
36.4%
#3
33.3%
#4
32.6%
#5
30.6%
#6
26.4%
#7
21.6%
#8
21.3%
#9
20.8%
#10
20.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in South Carolina?
Cope has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in South Carolina with 81.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in the State of South Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in South Carolina is 3.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation in the United States is 3.8%.