Crow Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Crow
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Crow Single Mother Poverty
38.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,942,445 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 38.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in poverty level among single mothers.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Crow and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Crow influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Crow simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Crow by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Pima (38.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Yemen (38.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Cheyenne (38.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Sioux (38.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and Colville (39.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 36.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 37.1% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 37.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 37.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 38.5% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 38.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 38.6% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 38.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 38.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 40.2% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 40.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 43.0% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 43.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 43.5% |
Crow Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.023% | 13.6% |
Maximum | 91.7% | 63.4% |
Range | 91.6% | 49.8% |
Mean | 30.1% | 44.8% |
Median | 8.2% | 44.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 35.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 56.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 69.6% | 21.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 35.5% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 34.8% | 12.8% |
Correlation Details
Crow Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.023% | 58,353,639 | 31.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 250,110 | 40.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 149,714 | 34.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 90,686 | 43.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.06% | 4,763 | 52.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.45% | 45,112 | 35.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 1,957 | 59.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 10,830 | 52.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 1,358 | 52.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.98% | 5,083 | 61.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 1,019 | 13.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,796 | 45.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.62% | 3,914 | 56.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 7.00% | 729 | 38.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.45% | 2,064 | 53.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.79% | 428 | 61.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.56% | 1,125 | 35.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.35% | 783 | 35.0% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.74% | 3,803 | 26.8% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.12% | 5,199 | 22.4% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.23% | 576 | 37.5% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.09% | 1,602 | 60.0% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.96% | 459 | 58.8% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.61% | 660 | 39.3% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.61% | 2,180 | 56.5% |
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.40% | 262 | 50.0% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.03% | 629 | 39.3% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.65% | 1,965 | 63.4% |