Crow Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Crow
Select to Compare
Married-couple Households
Crow Married-couple Households
41.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,202,817 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186 and weighted average of 41.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.071% in percentage of married-couple family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Crow and percentage of married-couple family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Crow influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of married-couple family households within an area, or if Crow simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of married-couple family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Crow by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Guyanese (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (41.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Haitian (41.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Immigrants from Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 40.9% |
Crow Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow Data | Married-couple Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.023% | 21.9% |
| Maximum | 93.4% | 80.8% |
| Range | 93.4% | 58.9% |
| Mean | 30.3% | 45.1% |
| Median | 11.9% | 43.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 37.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.3% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 57.7% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 34.0% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 33.5% | 12.9% |
Correlation Details
| Crow Percentile | Sample Size | Married-couple Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.023% | 58,539,702 | 40.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 293,509 | 48.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 166,103 | 42.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 92,761 | 53.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 7,192 | 51.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.45% | 49,253 | 37.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 2,129 | 53.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 11,598 | 47.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.23% | 1,560 | 27.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 5,276 | 37.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 1,019 | 38.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,796 | 39.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 4,223 | 42.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 785 | 45.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.45% | 2,064 | 32.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 2,817 | 50.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.53% | 190 | 80.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.36% | 176 | 56.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.50% | 48 | 42.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.79% | 428 | 56.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 69.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.56% | 1,125 | 36.9% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.35% | 783 | 29.3% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.75% | 3,985 | 44.1% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.12% | 5,199 | 48.7% |
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.12% | 172 | 60.6% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.41% | 78 | 59.4% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.23% | 576 | 38.1% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.09% | 1,602 | 55.3% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.96% | 459 | 48.9% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.61% | 660 | 36.4% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.61% | 2,180 | 25.6% |
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.40% | 262 | 21.9% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.03% | 629 | 36.2% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.65% | 1,965 | 22.9% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.45% | 473 | 66.2% |