Crow Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Crow
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Crow Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
33.2%
POVERTY | FEMALES 18-24
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,788,428 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216 and weighted average of 33.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.11% in poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Crow and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Crow influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 within an area, or if Crow simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Crow by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Lumbee (31.1%, a difference of 7.0%), Tohono O'odham (31.0%, a difference of 7.1%), Navajo (30.3%, a difference of 9.6%), Puerto Rican (29.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and Kiowa (29.2%, a difference of 13.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 28.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.2% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.8% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.1% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 33.2% |
Crow Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow Data | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.022% | 14.1% |
| Maximum | 91.7% | 74.1% |
| Range | 91.6% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 30.5% | 41.6% |
| Median | 10.7% | 46.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 53.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 68.9% | 29.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 35.2% | 17.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 34.6% | 17.6% |
Correlation Details
| Crow Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 58,218,009 | 23.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 242,896 | 21.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 157,930 | 20.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 77,868 | 29.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.08% | 4,750 | 50.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.45% | 46,232 | 25.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 6,176 | 36.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 1,358 | 15.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 1,799 | 60.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 1,019 | 47.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 1,440 | 46.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 4,223 | 49.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.45% | 2,064 | 54.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 2,817 | 37.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.36% | 176 | 74.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.79% | 428 | 69.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.56% | 1,125 | 16.2% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.35% | 783 | 23.9% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.74% | 3,803 | 52.7% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.12% | 5,199 | 51.0% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.23% | 576 | 17.6% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.09% | 1,602 | 14.1% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.96% | 459 | 57.9% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.61% | 660 | 50.0% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.61% | 2,180 | 62.9% |
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.40% | 262 | 42.9% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.03% | 629 | 50.0% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.65% | 1,965 | 62.9% |