Crow Male Poverty
COMPARE
Crow
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Crow Male Poverty
19.1%
POVERTY | MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,196,119 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.11% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Crow and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Crow influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Crow simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Crow by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 2.2%), Sioux (18.7%, a difference of 2.3%), Pueblo (18.5%, a difference of 3.4%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
Crow Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow Data | Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.023% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 93.4% | 46.9% |
Range | 93.4% | 42.8% |
Mean | 30.9% | 22.4% |
Median | 12.5% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.2% | 33.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 64.0% | 20.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 34.3% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 33.8% | 11.5% |
Correlation Details
Crow Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.023% | 58,533,144 | 13.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 293,063 | 12.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 166,103 | 12.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 93,100 | 12.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 7,192 | 11.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.45% | 49,253 | 16.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 2,129 | 9.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 11,598 | 15.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.23% | 1,560 | 36.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 5,276 | 27.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 1,019 | 15.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,953 | 21.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 4,223 | 33.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 785 | 15.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.45% | 2,064 | 46.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 2,817 | 33.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.36% | 176 | 18.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.50% | 48 | 4.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.79% | 428 | 37.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 7.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.56% | 1,125 | 25.8% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.35% | 783 | 29.8% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.75% | 3,985 | 15.0% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.12% | 5,199 | 16.3% |
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.12% | 172 | 9.7% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.41% | 78 | 15.0% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.23% | 576 | 23.0% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.09% | 1,602 | 27.6% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.96% | 459 | 35.4% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.61% | 660 | 30.4% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.61% | 2,180 | 39.4% |
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.40% | 262 | 34.5% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.03% | 629 | 31.2% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.65% | 1,965 | 42.3% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.45% | 473 | 4.1% |