Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Iowa

Q: What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Iowa?

Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Iowa are: #1 Jacksonville 100.0% . #2 Swan 54.2% . #3 Burr Oak 50.0% . #4 Jolley 50.0% . #5 Kiron 47.7% . #6 Decatur City 46.6% . #7 Duncan 46.3% . #8 Chelsea 44.3% . #9 Onslow 43.5% . #10 Randalia 43.1% .

On this page

Comparison Map Comparison Data Common Questions

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty

Population

Highest Population Highest Population Density Lowest Population Density Male / Female Ratio Female / Male Ratio Oldest Population Oldest Population | Male Oldest Population | Female Youngest Population Youngest Population | Male Youngest Population | Female

Families and Households

Largest Family Size Largest Household Size Most Single Fathers Most Single Mothers Fewest Single Fathers Fewest Single Mothers Smallest Family Size Smallest Household Size

Female Fertility

Female Fertility (Unmarried)

Race (Community Size)

Asian Black / African American Hawaiian / Pacific Hispanic or Latino Native / Alaskan White / Caucasian

Race (Percentage)

Asian Black / African American Hawaiian / Pacific Hispanic or Latino Native / Alaskan White / Caucasian

Ancestry (Community Size)

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian / Chaldean / Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czech Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian / Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Ancestry (Percentage)

Immigrant Origin (Total)

Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Azores Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma / Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe

Immigrant Origin (Percentage)

Income

Highest Per Capita Income Highest Earnings | Male Highest Earnings | Female Highest Wage/Income Gap ($)Highest Wage/Income Gap (%)Highest Inequality / Gini Index Lowest Per Capita Income Lowest Earnings | Male Lowest Earnings | Female Lowest Wage/Income Gap ($)Lowest Wage/Income Gap (%)Lowest Inequality / Gini Index

Income (Families)

Highest Family Income Lowest Family Income Family Income | $0-10k Family Income | $100k+Family Income | $200k+

Income (Households)

Highest Household Income Lowest Household Income Household Income | $0-10k Household Income | $200k+Household Income | $100k+

Poverty

Poverty (Families)

Unemployment

Employment Occupations

Architecture & Engineering Arts, Media & Entertainment Business & Financial Cleaning & Maintenance Community & Social Service Computer & Mathematics Computer, Engineering & Science Construction & Extraction Education Instruction & Library Education, Arts & Media Farming, Fishing & Forestry Firefighting & Prevention Food Preparation & Serving Health Diagnosing & Treating Health Technologists Healthcare Support Installation, Maintenance & Repair Law Enforcement Legal Services & Support Life, Physical & Social Science Management Material Moving Office & Administration Personal Care and Service Production Sales & Related Security & Protection Transportation

Employment Industries

Accommodation & Food Services Administrative & Support Services Agriculture, Fishing & Hunting Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Construction Educational Services Enterprise Management Finance & Insurance Health Care & Social Assistance Information & Technology Manufacturing Mining, Quarrying, & Extraction Professional & Scientific Services Public Administration Real Estate, Rental & Leasing Retail Trade Transportation & Warehousing Utilities Wholesale Trade

Employer Class

Private Company Employees Self-Employed / Incorporated Self-Employed / Not Incorporated Not-for-profit Organizations Local Government Employees State Government Employees Federal Government Employees Unpaid Family Workers

Commute Time

Longest Commute Longest Commute | Male Longest Commute | Female Shortest Commute Shortest Commute | Male Shortest Commute | Female

Commute Means

Drive | Alone Drive | Carpool Public Transit Taxi / Cab Walk to Work Work from Home

School Enrollment

In Private School Nursery / Preschool Kindergarten Elementary School Middle School High School College University

Education by Degree Field

Computers and Mathematics Bio, Nature & Agricultural Physical and Health Sciences Psychology Social Sciences Engineering Multidisciplinary Studies Science and Engineering Business Education Literature and Languages Liberal Arts and History Visual and Performing Arts Communications Arts and Humanities

Occupancy

Highest Owner-Occupied Highest Renter-Occupied Lowest Owner-Occupied Lowest Renter-Occupied

Finances

Highest Median Housing Costs Highest Property Prices Highest Owner Housing Costs Highest Renter Housing Costs Highest Housing Costs / Income Lowest Median Housing Costs Lowest Property Prices Lowest Owner Housing Costs Lowest Renter Housing Costs Lowest Housing Costs / Income

Physical Characteristics

Detached Home Residency Condo/Apartment Residency Utility Gas Heating Bottled Gas / LP Heating Electrical Heating Fuel Oil Heating Coal / Coke Heating Fuel-less Heating Households without a Cars Households with 1 or more Cars Households with 2 or more Cars Households with 3 or more Cars

Iowa

Compare Cities

Comparison Subject

Compare StatesCompare CitiesCompare Zip Codes

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Iowa

0.0%

100.0%

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level in Iowa

	City	Poverty	vs State	vs National
1.	Jacksonville	100.0%	11.1% (+88.9)#1	12.5% (+87.5)#113
2.	Swan	54.2%	11.1% (+43.1)#2	12.5% (+41.7)#697
3.	Burr Oak	50.0%	11.1% (+38.9)#3	12.5% (+37.5)#903
4.	Jolley	50.0%	11.1% (+38.9)#4	12.5% (+37.5)#911
5.	Kiron	47.7%	11.1% (+36.5)#5	12.5% (+35.1)#1,046
6.	Decatur City	46.6%	11.1% (+35.5)#6	12.5% (+34.0)#1,135
7.	Duncan	46.3%	11.1% (+35.1)#7	12.5% (+33.7)#1,163
8.	Chelsea	44.3%	11.1% (+33.2)#8	12.5% (+31.8)#1,301
9.	Onslow	43.5%	11.1% (+32.3)#9	12.5% (+30.9)#1,372
10.	Randalia	43.1%	11.1% (+32.0)#10	12.5% (+30.5)#1,410
11.	Thor	43.0%	11.1% (+31.9)#11	12.5% (+30.5)#1,418
12.	Mineola	42.3%	11.1% (+31.2)#12	12.5% (+29.8)#1,479
13.	Osterdock	39.1%	11.1% (+28.0)#13	12.5% (+26.5)#1,784
14.	Oakville	37.5%	11.1% (+26.4)#14	12.5% (+25.0)#1,976
15.	Zwingle	36.8%	11.1% (+25.7)#15	12.5% (+24.3)#2,085
16.	Fairport	35.7%	11.1% (+24.6)#16	12.5% (+23.2)#2,247
17.	Hayesville	35.3%	11.1% (+24.2)#17	12.5% (+22.8)#2,316
18.	Woodburn	34.2%	11.1% (+23.1)#18	12.5% (+21.7)#2,482
19.	Oto	34.2%	11.1% (+23.1)#19	12.5% (+21.7)#2,491
20.	Ferguson	33.3%	11.1% (+22.2)#20	12.5% (+20.8)#2,659
21.	Milton	32.5%	11.1% (+21.4)#21	12.5% (+19.9)#2,841
22.	Lanesboro	32.3%	11.1% (+21.1)#22	12.5% (+19.7)#2,898
23.	Alexander	32.2%	11.1% (+21.1)#23	12.5% (+19.7)#2,909
24.	Rowan	32.1%	11.1% (+21.0)#24	12.5% (+19.6)#2,922
25.	Somers	32.1%	11.1% (+21.0)#25	12.5% (+19.6)#2,934
26.	Bradgate	31.9%	11.1% (+20.8)#26	12.5% (+19.4)#2,975
27.	Derby	31.8%	11.1% (+20.7)#27	12.5% (+19.3)#2,997
28.	Kimballton	31.7%	11.1% (+20.6)#28	12.5% (+19.2)#3,024
29.	Meservey	31.7%	11.1% (+20.6)#29	12.5% (+19.1)#3,031
30.	Ackworth	31.1%	11.1% (+20.0)#30	12.5% (+18.6)#3,158
31.	Aspinwall	31.0%	11.1% (+19.9)#31	12.5% (+18.5)#3,183
32.	Moorhead	30.8%	11.1% (+19.7)#32	12.5% (+18.3)#3,216
33.	Andover	30.6%	11.1% (+19.5)#33	12.5% (+18.0)#3,281
34.	Melvin	29.4%	11.1% (+18.3)#34	12.5% (+16.8)#3,569
35.	Burt	29.2%	11.1% (+18.1)#35	12.5% (+16.7)#3,611
36.	Martinsburg	29.1%	11.1% (+18.0)#36	12.5% (+16.6)#3,648
37.	St Anthony	28.9%	11.1% (+17.8)#37	12.5% (+16.4)#3,691
38.	Coburg	28.9%	11.1% (+17.8)#38	12.5% (+16.4)#3,701
39.	Havelock	28.3%	11.1% (+17.2)#39	12.5% (+15.8)#3,886
40.	Bagley	27.0%	11.1% (+15.8)#40	12.5% (+14.4)#4,330
41.	Harcourt	26.9%	11.1% (+15.8)#41	12.5% (+14.4)#4,334
42.	Ames	26.8%	11.1% (+15.7)#42	12.5% (+14.3)#4,382
43.	Iowa City	26.7%	11.1% (+15.6)#43	12.5% (+14.2)#4,402
44.	Swea City	26.7%	11.1% (+15.5)#44	12.5% (+14.1)#4,431
45.	Bridgewater	26.6%	11.1% (+15.5)#45	12.5% (+14.1)#4,449
46.	What Cheer	26.4%	11.1% (+15.3)#46	12.5% (+13.8)#4,523
47.	West Chester	26.3%	11.1% (+15.2)#47	12.5% (+13.8)#4,545
48.	Rembrandt	26.3%	11.1% (+15.1)#48	12.5% (+13.7)#4,565
49.	Casey	26.1%	11.1% (+15.0)#49	12.5% (+13.6)#4,613
50.	Coppock	26.1%	11.1% (+15.0)#50	12.5% (+13.6)#4,628
51.	Otranto	26.1%	11.1% (+15.0)#51	12.5% (+13.6)#4,630
52.	Galt	26.0%	11.1% (+14.9)#52	12.5% (+13.5)#4,673
53.	Calumet	25.9%	11.1% (+14.8)#54	12.5% (+13.4)#4,706
54.	Soldier	25.9%	11.1% (+14.8)#55	12.5% (+13.4)#4,707
55.	Bayard	25.8%	11.1% (+14.7)#56	12.5% (+13.3)#4,736
56.	Colwell	25.8%	11.1% (+14.7)#57	12.5% (+13.3)#4,739
57.	Postville	25.7%	11.1% (+14.6)#58	12.5% (+13.2)#4,779
58.	Centerville	25.3%	11.1% (+14.2)#59	12.5% (+12.7)#4,938
59.	Palmer	25.2%	11.1% (+14.1)#60	12.5% (+12.7)#4,970
60.	Maysville	25.1%	11.1% (+14.0)#61	12.5% (+12.6)#4,987
61.	Toronto	25.0%	11.1% (+13.9)#62	12.5% (+12.5)#5,063
62.	Allerton	24.9%	11.1% (+13.8)#63	12.5% (+12.4)#5,085
63.	Churdan	24.8%	11.1% (+13.7)#64	12.5% (+12.3)#5,120
64.	Hedrick	24.8%	11.1% (+13.7)#65	12.5% (+12.3)#5,122
65.	Terril	24.6%	11.1% (+13.5)#66	12.5% (+12.1)#5,234
66.	Marathon	24.5%	11.1% (+13.4)#67	12.5% (+12.0)#5,270
67.	Morley	24.5%	11.1% (+13.4)#68	12.5% (+12.0)#5,276
68.	Chariton	24.2%	11.1% (+13.0)#69	12.5% (+11.6)#5,405
69.	Bode	23.8%	11.1% (+12.7)#70	12.5% (+11.3)#5,545
70.	Oxford Junction	23.6%	11.1% (+12.5)#71	12.5% (+11.1)#5,640
71.	Hillsboro	23.6%	11.1% (+12.5)#72	12.5% (+11.1)#5,654
72.	Brighton	23.5%	11.1% (+12.4)#73	12.5% (+11.0)#5,702
73.	Villisca	23.4%	11.1% (+12.3)#74	12.5% (+10.9)#5,721
74.	Nodaway	23.4%	11.1% (+12.3)#75	12.5% (+10.9)#5,727
75.	Grant	23.4%	11.1% (+12.3)#76	12.5% (+10.9)#5,728
76.	South Amana	23.2%	11.1% (+12.1)#77	12.5% (+10.6)#5,862
77.	Lorimor	23.1%	11.1% (+12.0)#78	12.5% (+10.6)#5,899
78.	Melrose	23.0%	11.1% (+11.9)#79	12.5% (+10.5)#5,952
79.	Toledo	23.0%	11.1% (+11.9)#80	12.5% (+10.5)#5,964
80.	Russell	22.9%	11.1% (+11.8)#81	12.5% (+10.4)#5,990
81.	Garrison	22.9%	11.1% (+11.8)#82	12.5% (+10.3)#6,018
82.	Scarville	22.8%	11.1% (+11.7)#83	12.5% (+10.3)#6,058
83.	Farmersburg	22.8%	11.1% (+11.7)#84	12.5% (+10.2)#6,070
84.	Zearing	22.8%	11.1% (+11.6)#85	12.5% (+10.2)#6,072
85.	Fredonia	22.6%	11.1% (+11.5)#86	12.5% (+10.1)#6,139
86.	Ireton	22.5%	11.1% (+11.4)#87	12.5% (+10.0)#6,162
87.	Marne	22.4%	11.1% (+11.3)#88	12.5% (+9.91)#6,213
88.	Cherokee	22.4%	11.1% (+11.3)#89	12.5% (+9.85)#6,256
89.	Lansing	22.3%	11.1% (+11.2)#90	12.5% (+9.78)#6,302
90.	Aredale	22.2%	11.1% (+11.1)#91	12.5% (+9.69)#6,352
91.	Bassett	22.0%	11.1% (+10.9)#92	12.5% (+9.47)#6,461
92.	Cushing	21.9%	11.1% (+10.8)#93	12.5% (+9.40)#6,500
93.	Kellogg	21.9%	11.1% (+10.8)#94	12.5% (+9.36)#6,530
94.	Ringsted	21.9%	11.1% (+10.8)#95	12.5% (+9.33)#6,550
95.	Blakesburg	21.8%	11.1% (+10.7)#96	12.5% (+9.31)#6,558
96.	Galva	21.8%	11.1% (+10.7)#97	12.5% (+9.31)#6,559
97.	Westgate	21.8%	11.1% (+10.7)#98	12.5% (+9.31)#6,560
98.	Aurora	21.8%	11.1% (+10.7)#99	12.5% (+9.29)#6,573
99.	Baldwin	21.8%	11.1% (+10.7)#100	12.5% (+9.27)#6,587
100.	Elma	21.5%	11.1% (+10.4)#101	12.5% (+8.98)#6,754