Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Slavic
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Slavs
11.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,693,710 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,876,285 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.830 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 152.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Slavic |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 71.6% | 40.0% |
| Range | 65.8% | 39.0% |
| Mean | 23.0% | 7.6% |
| Median | 14.7% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.8% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.2% | 7.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Pueblo (11.1%, a difference of 0.93%), Pima (11.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 5.6%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and Immigrants from Yemen (12.8%, a difference of 14.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Macedonian (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Ukrainians | 99.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 4.5% |