Tohono O'odham Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Tohono O'odham Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
31.7%
POVERTY | CHILDREN < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,687,978 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 31.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.45% in poverty level among children under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among children under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tohono O'odham influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among children under the age of 16 within an area, or if Tohono O'odham simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among children under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 2.3%), Puerto Rican (32.5%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (30.2%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and Pima (29.0%, a difference of 9.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 29.0% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.5% |
Tohono O'odham Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham Data | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.034% | 9.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 90.1% |
| Mean | 28.1% | 46.5% |
| Median | 6.5% | 39.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.4% | 59.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.0% | 32.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 35.7% | 23.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 35.0% | 22.9% |
Correlation Details
| Tohono O'odham Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.034% | 56,767,173 | 19.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 1,355,101 | 25.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 385,118 | 28.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 66,171 | 39.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 11,962 | 39.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 56,832 | 32.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 5,072 | 51.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 1,835 | 58.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 1,178 | 38.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 1,824 | 53.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 965 | 20.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 5,820 | 39.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 733 | 23.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 7,564 | 27.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.57% | 2,403 | 53.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 454 | 9.9% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.52% | 3,621 | 17.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.96% | 392 | 61.1% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.26% | 2,021 | 83.4% |
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.45% | 918 | 40.1% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.20% | 314 | 75.3% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.94% | 8,434 | 56.6% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.67% | 353 | 59.3% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.12% | 882 | 69.0% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.37% | 187 | 100.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 651 | 86.7% |