Pueblo Poverty
COMPARE
Pueblo
Select to Compare
Poverty
Pueblo Poverty
19.4%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,076,911 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 19.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.13% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pueblo and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pueblo influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Pueblo simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pueblo by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Sioux (19.8%, a difference of 1.9%), Cheyenne (18.9%, a difference of 2.5%), Yuman (20.2%, a difference of 4.1%), Houma (18.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and Apache (18.4%, a difference of 5.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 21.9% |
Pueblo Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pueblo Data | Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.045% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 97.2% | 76.8% |
| Range | 97.2% | 75.1% |
| Mean | 41.3% | 23.4% |
| Median | 28.7% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.4% | 29.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 65.4% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 34.1% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 33.9% | 13.5% |
Correlation Details
| Pueblo Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.045% | 116,678,664 | 13.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 1,456,004 | 14.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 1,224,263 | 16.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 265,873 | 17.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 31,337 | 27.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 102,313 | 17.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 6,859 | 14.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 11,232 | 33.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 120,437 | 24.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.64% | 11,534 | 25.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 7,505 | 12.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 1,646 | 18.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 2,902 | 8.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.00% | 20,354 | 16.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 388 | 22.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.91% | 18,479 | 26.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.00% | 422 | 15.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69% | 1,063 | 19.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.17% | 423 | 1.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.89% | 1,845 | 28.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.40% | 1,790 | 20.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.81% | 237 | 32.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 776 | 26.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.97% | 11,614 | 15.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.30% | 3,894 | 18.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 15,895 | 13.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.69% | 1,472 | 6.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.52% | 932 | 9.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.42% | 310 | 2.6% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.50% | 1,914 | 13.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.86% | 287 | 46.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.14% | 422 | 45.7% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.20% | 2,165 | 16.4% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.03% | 2,336 | 13.5% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.58% | 971 | 18.1% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.52% | 5,675 | 19.7% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.81% | 591 | 27.2% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.16% | 219 | 34.9% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.43% | 516 | 16.7% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.72% | 3,817 | 20.0% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.23% | 2,906 | 20.6% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.60% | 728 | 15.8% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.91% | 81 | 25.9% |
[ 59.0% - 59.5% ] 59.41% | 340 | 76.8% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.63% | 1,270 | 2.5% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.32% | 2,841 | 17.1% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.25% | 3,393 | 26.7% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.75% | 2,021 | 17.4% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.86% | 1,422 | 43.0% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.70% | 722 | 15.6% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.51% | 515 | 31.7% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.40% | 125 | 32.0% |
[ 72.0% - 72.5% ] 72.28% | 1,349 | 33.0% |
[ 73.0% - 73.5% ] 73.48% | 230 | 25.7% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.26% | 5,520 | 22.3% |
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.96% | 481 | 16.2% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.72% | 1,006 | 7.7% |
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.27% | 1,173 | 16.1% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.30% | 886 | 14.6% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.19% | 574 | 32.9% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.97% | 1,283 | 23.2% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.99% | 1,430 | 32.3% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.77% | 229 | 68.7% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.93% | 1,824 | 53.4% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.37% | 2,070 | 21.6% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.82% | 1,877 | 18.0% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 1,743 | 30.4% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.45% | 620 | 11.1% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.42% | 730 | 24.1% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.35% | 2,324 | 54.8% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.79% | 9,033 | 29.3% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.20% | 6,789 | 30.4% |