Pueblo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Pueblo
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Pueblo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
25.2%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,548,196 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216 and weighted average of 25.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.15% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pueblo and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pueblo influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Pueblo simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pueblo by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Sioux (25.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Black/African American (24.7%, a difference of 2.2%), Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Pueblo Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pueblo Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.045% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 94.1% |
| Mean | 43.3% | 34.3% |
| Median | 36.9% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 80.7% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 72.5% | 20.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.1% | 25.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 35.8% | 25.7% |
Correlation Details
| Pueblo Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.045% | 116,263,247 | 18.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 1,393,250 | 20.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 1,205,477 | 21.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 263,029 | 24.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 24,830 | 46.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.85% | 96,790 | 24.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 6,436 | 22.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 10,805 | 43.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 120,302 | 34.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.64% | 11,534 | 38.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 6,699 | 20.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.50% | 1,454 | 27.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 2,902 | 14.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.00% | 19,827 | 19.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 388 | 27.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.91% | 18,479 | 40.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69% | 1,063 | 12.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.84% | 489 | 43.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.40% | 1,552 | 48.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.25% | 547 | 11.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.97% | 11,614 | 19.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.02% | 1,583 | 21.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 15,895 | 17.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.52% | 932 | 14.7% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.86% | 287 | 100.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.20% | 2,165 | 20.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.03% | 2,336 | 24.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.52% | 5,675 | 21.1% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.16% | 219 | 100.0% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.72% | 3,817 | 15.0% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.23% | 2,906 | 22.7% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.06% | 922 | 88.2% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.60% | 728 | 9.7% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.32% | 2,841 | 30.3% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.25% | 3,393 | 15.7% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.75% | 2,021 | 25.7% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.86% | 1,422 | 54.1% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.70% | 722 | 25.4% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.51% | 515 | 36.0% |
[ 72.0% - 72.5% ] 72.28% | 1,349 | 22.9% |
[ 73.0% - 73.5% ] 73.48% | 230 | 100.0% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.26% | 5,520 | 27.7% |
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.96% | 481 | 20.4% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.72% | 1,006 | 5.9% |
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.27% | 1,173 | 16.1% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.01% | 359 | 7.7% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.97% | 1,283 | 11.8% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.99% | 1,430 | 21.7% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.77% | 229 | 100.0% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.93% | 1,824 | 56.3% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.37% | 2,070 | 26.9% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.82% | 1,877 | 28.7% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.95% | 1,259 | 47.8% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.44% | 655 | 15.2% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.35% | 2,324 | 86.1% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.79% | 9,033 | 37.2% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.20% | 6,789 | 38.1% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 212 | 100.0% |