Pueblo Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pueblo
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Pueblo Single Female Poverty
28.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,546,041 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215 and weighted average of 28.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.10% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Pueblo and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Pueblo influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Pueblo simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Pueblo by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.73%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Colville (29.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Pueblo Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pueblo Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.045% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 97.1% |
| Mean | 45.6% | 35.5% |
| Median | 40.0% | 32.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 23.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.7% | 46.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 75.2% | 22.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.6% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.2% | 17.4% |
Correlation Details
| Pueblo Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.045% | 116,255,270 | 22.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 1,400,552 | 23.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 1,212,167 | 24.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 265,822 | 26.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 27,424 | 47.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 92,389 | 23.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.30% | 2,210 | 46.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 10,805 | 37.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18% | 120,437 | 35.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 9,798 | 61.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.14% | 5,644 | 25.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.50% | 1,454 | 34.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.00% | 19,827 | 23.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 388 | 36.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.91% | 18,479 | 37.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69% | 1,063 | 23.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.84% | 489 | 57.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.40% | 1,790 | 23.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.97% | 11,614 | 22.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.02% | 1,583 | 25.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 15,895 | 15.3% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.52% | 932 | 28.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.20% | 2,165 | 17.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.03% | 2,336 | 20.6% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.50% | 5,450 | 41.9% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.81% | 591 | 44.4% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.43% | 516 | 44.4% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.72% | 3,817 | 46.4% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.23% | 2,906 | 27.6% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.06% | 922 | 55.9% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.32% | 2,841 | 24.7% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.25% | 3,393 | 33.9% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.75% | 2,021 | 41.1% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.86% | 1,422 | 21.2% |
[ 68.5% - 69.0% ] 68.70% | 722 | 11.8% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.51% | 515 | 45.0% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.40% | 125 | 55.0% |
[ 72.0% - 72.5% ] 72.28% | 1,349 | 52.7% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.26% | 5,520 | 29.5% |
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.96% | 481 | 28.6% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.72% | 1,006 | 12.9% |
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.27% | 1,173 | 22.3% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.19% | 574 | 24.1% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.97% | 1,283 | 8.8% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.99% | 1,430 | 50.6% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.77% | 229 | 52.9% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.93% | 1,824 | 64.6% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.37% | 2,070 | 22.6% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.82% | 1,877 | 31.3% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.94% | 1,743 | 45.7% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.45% | 620 | 2.9% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.42% | 730 | 50.6% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.35% | 2,324 | 77.1% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.79% | 9,033 | 38.8% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.20% | 6,789 | 37.5% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 212 | 100.0% |