Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Child 0-5
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Carolina

15.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Carolina

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Southern Pines 0.48% 20.3% (-19.8)#1 18.1% (-17.6)#20
2. Pinebluff 0.56% 20.3% (-19.7)#2 18.1% (-17.5)#27
3. Troutman 1.2% 20.3% (-19.0)#3 18.1% (-16.8)#144
4. Holly Springs 1.3% 20.3% (-19.0)#4 18.1% (-16.7)#164
5. Wake Forest 1.8% 20.3% (-18.5)#5 18.1% (-16.3)#287
6. Weddington 2.0% 20.3% (-18.3)#6 18.1% (-16.1)#328
7. Yadkinville 2.8% 20.3% (-17.5)#7 18.1% (-15.3)#608
8. Cornelius 2.8% 20.3% (-17.5)#8 18.1% (-15.2)#638
9. Murraysville 2.9% 20.3% (-17.4)#9 18.1% (-15.1)#677
10. Rockfish 3.0% 20.3% (-17.3)#10 18.1% (-15.1)#710
11. Richfield 3.1% 20.3% (-17.2)#11 18.1% (-15.0)#734
12. Garner 3.2% 20.3% (-17.1)#12 18.1% (-14.9)#774
13. Ogden 3.2% 20.3% (-17.1)#13 18.1% (-14.9)#775
14. Apex 3.2% 20.3% (-17.0)#14 18.1% (-14.8)#810
15. Beaufort 3.3% 20.3% (-16.9)#15 18.1% (-14.7)#839
16. Harrisburg 3.4% 20.3% (-16.9)#16 18.1% (-14.6)#884
17. Archdale 3.6% 20.3% (-16.7)#17 18.1% (-14.5)#946
18. Half Moon 3.7% 20.3% (-16.6)#18 18.1% (-14.3)#1,010
19. Indian Trail 3.7% 20.3% (-16.5)#19 18.1% (-14.3)#1,017
20. King 3.8% 20.3% (-16.5)#20 18.1% (-14.2)#1,051
21. Surf City 3.9% 20.3% (-16.4)#21 18.1% (-14.2)#1,074
22. Richlands 3.9% 20.3% (-16.4)#22 18.1% (-14.2)#1,085
23. Etowah 4.1% 20.3% (-16.1)#23 18.1% (-13.9)#1,173
24. Kill Devil Hills 4.2% 20.3% (-16.1)#24 18.1% (-13.9)#1,214
25. Lillington 4.3% 20.3% (-15.9)#25 18.1% (-13.7)#1,266
26. Pine Level 4.6% 20.3% (-15.7)#26 18.1% (-13.5)#1,377
27. Cary 4.7% 20.3% (-15.6)#27 18.1% (-13.4)#1,420
28. Cove City 4.8% 20.3% (-15.5)#28 18.1% (-13.3)#1,455
29. Morven 4.8% 20.3% (-15.5)#29 18.1% (-13.3)#1,462
30. Gibsonville 4.8% 20.3% (-15.5)#30 18.1% (-13.3)#1,491
31. Stedman 4.9% 20.3% (-15.3)#31 18.1% (-13.1)#1,545
32. Wesley Chapel 5.1% 20.3% (-15.2)#32 18.1% (-12.9)#1,622
33. Spout Springs 5.2% 20.3% (-15.1)#33 18.1% (-12.9)#1,642
34. Zebulon 5.2% 20.3% (-15.1)#34 18.1% (-12.9)#1,643
35. Stallings 5.2% 20.3% (-15.1)#35 18.1% (-12.9)#1,648
36. Huntersville 5.2% 20.3% (-15.1)#36 18.1% (-12.9)#1,661
37. Hollister 5.3% 20.3% (-15.0)#37 18.1% (-12.8)#1,687
38. Black Mountain 5.3% 20.3% (-15.0)#38 18.1% (-12.8)#1,705
39. Stanley 5.4% 20.3% (-14.9)#39 18.1% (-12.6)#1,758
40. West Jefferson 5.5% 20.3% (-14.8)#40 18.1% (-12.6)#1,768
41. Clyde 5.5% 20.3% (-14.8)#41 18.1% (-12.6)#1,780
42. Youngsville 5.6% 20.3% (-14.7)#42 18.1% (-12.5)#1,798
43. Matthews 5.7% 20.3% (-14.6)#43 18.1% (-12.4)#1,855
44. Franklinton 5.7% 20.3% (-14.6)#44 18.1% (-12.4)#1,870
45. Moyock 5.7% 20.3% (-14.6)#45 18.1% (-12.4)#1,872
46. Vass 5.9% 20.3% (-14.4)#46 18.1% (-12.1)#1,958
47. Mills River 6.0% 20.3% (-14.3)#47 18.1% (-12.1)#1,967
48. Knightdale 6.0% 20.3% (-14.3)#48 18.1% (-12.1)#1,990
49. Mineral Springs 6.1% 20.3% (-14.1)#49 18.1% (-11.9)#2,037
50. Biltmore Forest 6.4% 20.3% (-13.9)#50 18.1% (-11.7)#2,158
51. Claremont 6.5% 20.3% (-13.8)#51 18.1% (-11.6)#2,189
52. Spindale 6.5% 20.3% (-13.8)#52 18.1% (-11.5)#2,196
53. Star 6.8% 20.3% (-13.5)#53 18.1% (-11.3)#2,320
54. Stanfield 6.8% 20.3% (-13.5)#54 18.1% (-11.3)#2,326
55. Leland 6.8% 20.3% (-13.5)#55 18.1% (-11.3)#2,332
56. Elk Park 6.9% 20.3% (-13.4)#56 18.1% (-11.2)#2,375
57. Wanchese 6.9% 20.3% (-13.4)#57 18.1% (-11.1)#2,391
58. Mayodan 7.0% 20.3% (-13.3)#58 18.1% (-11.1)#2,422
59. Rockwell 7.0% 20.3% (-13.2)#59 18.1% (-11.0)#2,442
60. Porters Neck 7.3% 20.3% (-13.0)#60 18.1% (-10.8)#2,535
61. Clemmons 7.4% 20.3% (-12.9)#61 18.1% (-10.7)#2,572
62. Salem 7.5% 20.3% (-12.8)#62 18.1% (-10.6)#2,633
63. Mooresville 7.6% 20.3% (-12.7)#63 18.1% (-10.5)#2,656
64. Polkville 7.7% 20.3% (-12.6)#64 18.1% (-10.4)#2,721
65. Weaverville 7.8% 20.3% (-12.4)#65 18.1% (-10.2)#2,779
66. Fletcher 7.9% 20.3% (-12.4)#66 18.1% (-10.1)#2,802
67. Pineville 8.0% 20.3% (-12.3)#67 18.1% (-10.0)#2,844
68. Pinehurst 8.1% 20.3% (-12.2)#68 18.1% (-9.97)#2,864
69. Mint Hill 8.3% 20.3% (-12.0)#69 18.1% (-9.74)#2,945
70. Pleasant Garden 8.3% 20.3% (-11.9)#70 18.1% (-9.73)#2,949
71. Spring Hope 8.3% 20.3% (-11.9)#71 18.1% (-9.73)#2,961
72. Aurora 8.3% 20.3% (-11.9)#72 18.1% (-9.73)#2,969
73. Belmont 8.6% 20.3% (-11.7)#73 18.1% (-9.44)#3,094
74. Skippers Corner 8.8% 20.3% (-11.5)#74 18.1% (-9.26)#3,170
75. Chapel Hill 8.9% 20.3% (-11.4)#75 18.1% (-9.18)#3,198
76. Drexel 9.0% 20.3% (-11.3)#76 18.1% (-9.09)#3,234
77. Walstonburg 9.1% 20.3% (-11.2)#77 18.1% (-8.97)#3,309
78. Lansing 9.1% 20.3% (-11.2)#78 18.1% (-8.97)#3,311
79. Morrisville 9.1% 20.3% (-11.2)#79 18.1% (-8.94)#3,322
80. Winterville 9.3% 20.3% (-11.0)#80 18.1% (-8.74)#3,400
81. Ayden 9.4% 20.3% (-10.8)#81 18.1% (-8.61)#3,436
82. Oak Ridge 9.7% 20.3% (-10.6)#82 18.1% (-8.41)#3,528
83. Jonesville 9.9% 20.3% (-10.4)#83 18.1% (-8.15)#3,612
84. Fuquay Varina 10.0% 20.3% (-10.3)#84 18.1% (-8.09)#3,618
85. Red Cross 10.0% 20.3% (-10.3)#85 18.1% (-8.06)#3,646
86. Butner 10.1% 20.3% (-10.2)#86 18.1% (-8.01)#3,687
87. Waxhaw 10.3% 20.3% (-9.97)#87 18.1% (-7.75)#3,780
88. Concord 10.3% 20.3% (-9.93)#88 18.1% (-7.71)#3,796
89. Whiteville 10.4% 20.3% (-9.88)#89 18.1% (-7.66)#3,808
90. Mount Pleasant 10.5% 20.3% (-9.75)#90 18.1% (-7.54)#3,861
91. Angier 10.7% 20.3% (-9.54)#91 18.1% (-7.32)#3,954
92. Kernersville 10.8% 20.3% (-9.47)#92 18.1% (-7.26)#3,973
93. Hildebran 11.0% 20.3% (-9.30)#93 18.1% (-7.09)#4,032
94. Locust 11.1% 20.3% (-9.17)#94 18.1% (-6.95)#4,068
95. Glen Raven 11.1% 20.3% (-9.17)#95 18.1% (-6.95)#4,070
96. Marshall 11.1% 20.3% (-9.17)#96 18.1% (-6.95)#4,100
97. Welcome 11.3% 20.3% (-8.96)#97 18.1% (-6.74)#4,193
98. Creedmoor 11.8% 20.3% (-8.48)#98 18.1% (-6.26)#4,385
99. Clayton 11.8% 20.3% (-8.45)#99 18.1% (-6.24)#4,396
100. Elizabeth City 12.1% 20.3% (-8.13)#100 18.1% (-5.91)#4,507

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Carolina are:
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Carolina?
Southern Pines has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Carolina with 0.48%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in North Carolina is 20.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 5 in the United States is 18.1%.