Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina

25.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Granite Quarry 2.7% 35.6% (-32.9)#1 33.1% (-30.4)#74
2. Rockfish 3.5% 35.6% (-32.1)#2 33.1% (-29.6)#134
3. Sharpsburg 4.3% 35.6% (-31.3)#3 33.1% (-28.8)#204
4. Broad Creek 4.7% 35.6% (-30.9)#4 33.1% (-28.4)#248
5. Marshall 5.0% 35.6% (-30.6)#5 33.1% (-28.1)#297
6. Candor 5.4% 35.6% (-30.3)#6 33.1% (-27.8)#347
7. Wagram 6.2% 35.6% (-29.4)#7 33.1% (-26.9)#472
8. Beaufort 7.0% 35.6% (-28.6)#8 33.1% (-26.1)#593
9. Drexel 7.4% 35.6% (-28.2)#9 33.1% (-25.7)#669
10. Landis 7.5% 35.6% (-28.1)#10 33.1% (-25.6)#689
11. Claremont 7.5% 35.6% (-28.1)#11 33.1% (-25.6)#690
12. Murraysville 7.6% 35.6% (-28.0)#12 33.1% (-25.5)#701
13. Wake Forest 7.7% 35.6% (-27.9)#13 33.1% (-25.4)#711
14. Rhodhiss 7.7% 35.6% (-27.9)#14 33.1% (-25.4)#724
15. Hildebran 7.8% 35.6% (-27.8)#15 33.1% (-25.3)#751
16. Stallings 7.8% 35.6% (-27.8)#16 33.1% (-25.3)#753
17. Trinity 8.4% 35.6% (-27.3)#17 33.1% (-24.8)#867
18. Cajah S Mountain 8.4% 35.6% (-27.2)#18 33.1% (-24.7)#873
19. Weddington 8.6% 35.6% (-27.0)#19 33.1% (-24.5)#898
20. Mar Mac 8.8% 35.6% (-26.8)#20 33.1% (-24.3)#942
21. Garner 9.0% 35.6% (-26.6)#21 33.1% (-24.1)#985
22. King 9.0% 35.6% (-26.6)#22 33.1% (-24.1)#986
23. Roper 9.1% 35.6% (-26.5)#23 33.1% (-24.0)#1,008
24. Walkertown 9.3% 35.6% (-26.3)#24 33.1% (-23.8)#1,046
25. Oak Island 9.4% 35.6% (-26.2)#25 33.1% (-23.7)#1,051
26. Dobson 9.4% 35.6% (-26.2)#26 33.1% (-23.7)#1,055
27. Cedar Point 9.8% 35.6% (-25.9)#27 33.1% (-23.4)#1,118
28. Spring Hope 9.8% 35.6% (-25.8)#28 33.1% (-23.3)#1,131
29. Randleman 10.3% 35.6% (-25.3)#29 33.1% (-22.8)#1,239
30. Pinebluff 10.5% 35.6% (-25.1)#30 33.1% (-22.6)#1,277
31. Ogden 10.5% 35.6% (-25.1)#31 33.1% (-22.6)#1,296
32. Clayton 10.6% 35.6% (-25.1)#32 33.1% (-22.6)#1,297
33. Apex 10.7% 35.6% (-24.9)#33 33.1% (-22.4)#1,323
34. Kings Grant 10.7% 35.6% (-24.9)#34 33.1% (-22.4)#1,328
35. Marion 10.8% 35.6% (-24.9)#35 33.1% (-22.4)#1,344
36. Long View 10.8% 35.6% (-24.8)#36 33.1% (-22.3)#1,347
37. Creedmoor 10.8% 35.6% (-24.8)#37 33.1% (-22.3)#1,357
38. Cooleemee 11.1% 35.6% (-24.5)#38 33.1% (-22.0)#1,419
39. Micro 11.1% 35.6% (-24.5)#39 33.1% (-22.0)#1,440
40. Harrisburg 11.1% 35.6% (-24.5)#40 33.1% (-22.0)#1,450
41. Bryson City 11.3% 35.6% (-24.4)#41 33.1% (-21.9)#1,469
42. East Flat Rock 11.3% 35.6% (-24.3)#42 33.1% (-21.8)#1,477
43. Hillsborough 11.4% 35.6% (-24.3)#43 33.1% (-21.7)#1,489
44. Myrtle Grove 11.6% 35.6% (-24.1)#44 33.1% (-21.6)#1,527
45. Youngsville 11.8% 35.6% (-23.9)#45 33.1% (-21.4)#1,556
46. Clyde 11.9% 35.6% (-23.7)#46 33.1% (-21.2)#1,600
47. Whitakers 11.9% 35.6% (-23.7)#47 33.1% (-21.2)#1,602
48. Mayodan 12.0% 35.6% (-23.6)#48 33.1% (-21.1)#1,619
49. Ellerbe 12.1% 35.6% (-23.5)#49 33.1% (-21.0)#1,649
50. Norlina 12.3% 35.6% (-23.3)#50 33.1% (-20.8)#1,686
51. Moyock 12.6% 35.6% (-23.0)#51 33.1% (-20.5)#1,773
52. Carthage 12.9% 35.6% (-22.7)#52 33.1% (-20.2)#1,837
53. Clemmons 13.3% 35.6% (-22.3)#53 33.1% (-19.8)#1,922
54. Mcadenville 13.3% 35.6% (-22.3)#54 33.1% (-19.8)#1,935
55. Boardman 13.3% 35.6% (-22.3)#55 33.1% (-19.8)#1,961
56. Grandy 13.6% 35.6% (-22.0)#56 33.1% (-19.5)#2,009
57. Peletier 14.0% 35.6% (-21.6)#57 33.1% (-19.1)#2,085
58. Wesley Chapel 14.3% 35.6% (-21.4)#58 33.1% (-18.8)#2,137
59. Lake Waccamaw 14.3% 35.6% (-21.4)#59 33.1% (-18.8)#2,152
60. Lake Junaluska 14.5% 35.6% (-21.2)#60 33.1% (-18.7)#2,234
61. Indian Trail 14.5% 35.6% (-21.1)#61 33.1% (-18.6)#2,245
62. Waxhaw 14.9% 35.6% (-20.7)#62 33.1% (-18.2)#2,334
63. Eastover 15.0% 35.6% (-20.6)#63 33.1% (-18.1)#2,341
64. Princeville 15.1% 35.6% (-20.5)#64 33.1% (-18.0)#2,373
65. Wendell 15.2% 35.6% (-20.4)#65 33.1% (-17.9)#2,383
66. Gibsonville 15.4% 35.6% (-20.3)#66 33.1% (-17.8)#2,407
67. Star 15.4% 35.6% (-20.3)#67 33.1% (-17.8)#2,420
68. Stem 16.1% 35.6% (-19.6)#68 33.1% (-17.1)#2,610
69. Belville 16.5% 35.6% (-19.1)#69 33.1% (-16.6)#2,688
70. Zebulon 16.7% 35.6% (-19.0)#70 33.1% (-16.5)#2,715
71. Ossipee 16.7% 35.6% (-19.0)#71 33.1% (-16.5)#2,773
72. Bunn 16.7% 35.6% (-19.0)#72 33.1% (-16.5)#2,776
73. Black Mountain 16.8% 35.6% (-18.8)#73 33.1% (-16.3)#2,832
74. Icard 17.4% 35.6% (-18.2)#74 33.1% (-15.7)#2,945
75. Rutherford College 17.5% 35.6% (-18.1)#75 33.1% (-15.6)#2,968
76. Cary 17.7% 35.6% (-18.0)#76 33.1% (-15.5)#3,004
77. Huntersville 17.7% 35.6% (-17.9)#77 33.1% (-15.4)#3,007
78. Navassa 17.9% 35.6% (-17.8)#78 33.1% (-15.2)#3,061
79. Weaverville 17.9% 35.6% (-17.7)#79 33.1% (-15.2)#3,073
80. Wanchese 18.3% 35.6% (-17.4)#80 33.1% (-14.9)#3,187
81. Dublin 18.8% 35.6% (-16.9)#81 33.1% (-14.4)#3,305
82. Cofield 18.8% 35.6% (-16.9)#82 33.1% (-14.4)#3,307
83. Marvin 18.9% 35.6% (-16.7)#83 33.1% (-14.2)#3,350
84. Taylortown 18.9% 35.6% (-16.7)#84 33.1% (-14.2)#3,360
85. Knightdale 19.4% 35.6% (-16.3)#85 33.1% (-13.8)#3,455
86. Elm City 19.4% 35.6% (-16.3)#86 33.1% (-13.8)#3,460
87. Dallas 19.4% 35.6% (-16.2)#87 33.1% (-13.7)#3,471
88. Pinehurst 19.5% 35.6% (-16.2)#88 33.1% (-13.7)#3,486
89. Oakboro 19.6% 35.6% (-16.1)#89 33.1% (-13.6)#3,514
90. Vass 19.6% 35.6% (-16.1)#90 33.1% (-13.6)#3,515
91. Elroy 20.0% 35.6% (-15.6)#91 33.1% (-13.1)#3,592
92. Angier 20.3% 35.6% (-15.3)#92 33.1% (-12.8)#3,737
93. Boiling Springs 20.4% 35.6% (-15.3)#93 33.1% (-12.8)#3,755
94. Lillington 20.5% 35.6% (-15.2)#94 33.1% (-12.7)#3,775
95. Madison 20.5% 35.6% (-15.2)#95 33.1% (-12.7)#3,778
96. Newland 20.6% 35.6% (-15.0)#96 33.1% (-12.5)#3,826
97. Hemby Bridge 20.9% 35.6% (-14.7)#97 33.1% (-12.2)#3,911
98. Holly Springs 21.0% 35.6% (-14.6)#98 33.1% (-12.1)#3,933
99. Mebane 21.2% 35.6% (-14.4)#99 33.1% (-11.9)#3,984
100. Buxton 21.5% 35.6% (-14.1)#100 33.1% (-11.6)#4,088

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina are:
#1
2.7%
#2
3.5%
#3
4.3%
#4
4.7%
#5
5.0%
#6
5.4%
#7
6.2%
#8
7.0%
#9
7.4%
#10
7.5%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina?
Granite Quarry has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina with 2.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina is 35.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.