Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina

8.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Stem 0.31% 18.9% (-18.6)#1 16.9% (-16.6)#25
2. Weddington 0.32% 18.9% (-18.6)#2 16.9% (-16.6)#27
3. Rhodhiss 0.32% 18.9% (-18.6)#3 16.9% (-16.6)#28
4. Lake Norman Of Catawba 0.72% 18.9% (-18.2)#4 16.9% (-16.2)#141
5. Foxfire 0.81% 18.9% (-18.1)#5 16.9% (-16.1)#175
6. Rockfish 0.84% 18.9% (-18.1)#6 16.9% (-16.1)#199
7. Harrisburg 0.85% 18.9% (-18.1)#7 16.9% (-16.1)#206
8. Myrtle Grove 0.89% 18.9% (-18.0)#8 16.9% (-16.0)#235
9. Wesley Chapel 0.94% 18.9% (-18.0)#9 16.9% (-16.0)#250
10. Kitty Hawk 0.97% 18.9% (-18.0)#10 16.9% (-16.0)#264
11. Star 1.1% 18.9% (-17.9)#11 16.9% (-15.9)#310
12. Sneads Ferry 1.1% 18.9% (-17.9)#12 16.9% (-15.9)#312
13. Lake Waccamaw 1.4% 18.9% (-17.6)#13 16.9% (-15.6)#472
14. Mills River 1.4% 18.9% (-17.6)#14 16.9% (-15.6)#476
15. Garner 1.5% 18.9% (-17.5)#15 16.9% (-15.5)#552
16. Rolesville 1.6% 18.9% (-17.4)#16 16.9% (-15.4)#596
17. Emma 1.6% 18.9% (-17.4)#17 16.9% (-15.3)#616
18. Wanchese 1.7% 18.9% (-17.3)#18 16.9% (-15.3)#679
19. Landis 1.8% 18.9% (-17.1)#19 16.9% (-15.1)#757
20. Oakboro 1.8% 18.9% (-17.1)#20 16.9% (-15.1)#762
21. Tobaccoville 1.8% 18.9% (-17.1)#21 16.9% (-15.1)#782
22. Cerro Gordo 1.9% 18.9% (-17.1)#22 16.9% (-15.1)#797
23. Bunn 2.1% 18.9% (-16.9)#23 16.9% (-14.9)#950
24. Mayodan 2.1% 18.9% (-16.8)#24 16.9% (-14.8)#977
25. Stanley 2.1% 18.9% (-16.8)#25 16.9% (-14.8)#978
26. Lowesville 2.2% 18.9% (-16.7)#26 16.9% (-14.7)#1,061
27. Wingate 2.5% 18.9% (-16.4)#27 16.9% (-14.4)#1,220
28. Icard 2.5% 18.9% (-16.4)#28 16.9% (-14.4)#1,267
29. Stedman 2.6% 18.9% (-16.3)#29 16.9% (-14.3)#1,348
30. Wake Forest 2.8% 18.9% (-16.2)#30 16.9% (-14.2)#1,449
31. Lake Park 2.9% 18.9% (-16.0)#31 16.9% (-14.0)#1,550
32. Faith 3.0% 18.9% (-15.9)#32 16.9% (-13.9)#1,607
33. Murraysville 3.1% 18.9% (-15.9)#33 16.9% (-13.9)#1,665
34. Apex 3.1% 18.9% (-15.8)#34 16.9% (-13.8)#1,679
35. Holly Springs 3.1% 18.9% (-15.8)#35 16.9% (-13.8)#1,706
36. Rockwell 3.1% 18.9% (-15.8)#36 16.9% (-13.8)#1,710
37. Oak Island 3.2% 18.9% (-15.8)#37 16.9% (-13.8)#1,734
38. King 3.4% 18.9% (-15.6)#38 16.9% (-13.6)#1,870
39. Mcadenville 3.5% 18.9% (-15.5)#39 16.9% (-13.5)#1,934
40. Vass 3.6% 18.9% (-15.3)#40 16.9% (-13.3)#2,008
41. Porters Neck 3.6% 18.9% (-15.3)#41 16.9% (-13.3)#2,041
42. Wendell 3.8% 18.9% (-15.2)#42 16.9% (-13.2)#2,126
43. Black Mountain 3.8% 18.9% (-15.2)#43 16.9% (-13.2)#2,128
44. Pinehurst 4.0% 18.9% (-15.0)#44 16.9% (-13.0)#2,261
45. Oak Ridge 4.0% 18.9% (-15.0)#45 16.9% (-13.0)#2,264
46. Cedar Rock 4.0% 18.9% (-14.9)#46 16.9% (-12.9)#2,283
47. Winterville 4.0% 18.9% (-14.9)#47 16.9% (-12.9)#2,288
48. Mineral Springs 4.0% 18.9% (-14.9)#48 16.9% (-12.9)#2,309
49. Fletcher 4.0% 18.9% (-14.9)#49 16.9% (-12.9)#2,318
50. Dublin 4.1% 18.9% (-14.9)#50 16.9% (-12.9)#2,340
51. Middlesex 4.2% 18.9% (-14.7)#51 16.9% (-12.7)#2,447
52. Indian Trail 4.3% 18.9% (-14.6)#52 16.9% (-12.6)#2,496
53. Boiling Springs 4.4% 18.9% (-14.6)#53 16.9% (-12.6)#2,534
54. Ingold 4.6% 18.9% (-14.4)#54 16.9% (-12.4)#2,681
55. Gibsonville 4.7% 18.9% (-14.2)#55 16.9% (-12.2)#2,765
56. Matthews 4.7% 18.9% (-14.2)#56 16.9% (-12.2)#2,777
57. Pink Hill 4.8% 18.9% (-14.2)#57 16.9% (-12.2)#2,804
58. White Lake 4.8% 18.9% (-14.1)#58 16.9% (-12.1)#2,829
59. Cedar Point 4.8% 18.9% (-14.1)#59 16.9% (-12.1)#2,830
60. Rennert 4.9% 18.9% (-14.1)#60 16.9% (-12.1)#2,883
61. Elon 4.9% 18.9% (-14.0)#61 16.9% (-12.0)#2,893
62. Ogden 4.9% 18.9% (-14.0)#62 16.9% (-12.0)#2,904
63. Stallings 4.9% 18.9% (-14.0)#63 16.9% (-12.0)#2,938
64. Pantego 5.0% 18.9% (-13.9)#64 16.9% (-11.9)#2,974
65. Huntersville 5.0% 18.9% (-13.9)#65 16.9% (-11.9)#2,987
66. Waxhaw 5.0% 18.9% (-13.9)#66 16.9% (-11.9)#3,007
67. Pinebluff 5.2% 18.9% (-13.8)#67 16.9% (-11.8)#3,103
68. Sandy Creek 5.3% 18.9% (-13.7)#68 16.9% (-11.7)#3,157
69. Leland 5.3% 18.9% (-13.6)#69 16.9% (-11.6)#3,197
70. Richfield 5.4% 18.9% (-13.5)#70 16.9% (-11.5)#3,268
71. Hillsborough 5.4% 18.9% (-13.5)#71 16.9% (-11.5)#3,269
72. Swepsonville 5.5% 18.9% (-13.4)#72 16.9% (-11.4)#3,299
73. Davidson 5.6% 18.9% (-13.4)#73 16.9% (-11.4)#3,386
74. Old Fort 5.6% 18.9% (-13.3)#74 16.9% (-11.3)#3,398
75. Stokesdale 5.7% 18.9% (-13.3)#75 16.9% (-11.3)#3,453
76. Alliance 5.8% 18.9% (-13.1)#76 16.9% (-11.1)#3,534
77. Marietta 5.9% 18.9% (-13.1)#77 16.9% (-11.1)#3,605
78. Biltmore Forest 5.9% 18.9% (-13.0)#78 16.9% (-11.0)#3,615
79. Cary 5.9% 18.9% (-13.0)#79 16.9% (-11.0)#3,637
80. Surf City 6.0% 18.9% (-13.0)#80 16.9% (-11.0)#3,675
81. Mountain Home 6.1% 18.9% (-12.9)#81 16.9% (-10.9)#3,759
82. Creedmoor 6.1% 18.9% (-12.8)#82 16.9% (-10.8)#3,776
83. Stantonsburg 6.2% 18.9% (-12.7)#83 16.9% (-10.7)#3,869
84. Sedalia 6.2% 18.9% (-12.7)#84 16.9% (-10.7)#3,872
85. Cornelius 6.3% 18.9% (-12.7)#85 16.9% (-10.7)#3,892
86. Walnut Creek 6.4% 18.9% (-12.5)#86 16.9% (-10.5)#3,988
87. Forest Oaks 6.6% 18.9% (-12.3)#87 16.9% (-10.3)#4,128
88. Kill Devil Hills 6.7% 18.9% (-12.3)#88 16.9% (-10.3)#4,140
89. Buxton 6.8% 18.9% (-12.1)#89 16.9% (-10.1)#4,253
90. Pumpkin Center 6.8% 18.9% (-12.1)#90 16.9% (-10.1)#4,257
91. Madison 6.9% 18.9% (-12.1)#91 16.9% (-10.1)#4,277
92. Locust 6.9% 18.9% (-12.0)#92 16.9% (-10.0)#4,323
93. Grandy 6.9% 18.9% (-12.0)#93 16.9% (-10.0)#4,325
94. Lake Lure 7.0% 18.9% (-12.0)#94 16.9% (-9.96)#4,351
95. Carolina Beach 7.1% 18.9% (-11.8)#95 16.9% (-9.84)#4,441
96. Eastover 7.3% 18.9% (-11.7)#96 16.9% (-9.66)#4,570
97. Lillington 7.3% 18.9% (-11.6)#97 16.9% (-9.60)#4,621
98. Troutman 7.4% 18.9% (-11.5)#98 16.9% (-9.53)#4,661
99. Angier 7.5% 18.9% (-11.4)#99 16.9% (-9.40)#4,736
100. Dobson 7.5% 18.9% (-11.4)#100 16.9% (-9.40)#4,737

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina are:
#1
0.31%
#2
0.32%
#3
0.32%
#4
0.72%
#5
0.81%
#6
0.84%
#7
0.85%
#8
0.89%
#9
0.94%
#10
0.97%
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina?
Stem has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina with 0.31%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina is 18.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.