Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Information in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Information & Technology
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Information in North Carolina

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Information in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Information in North Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Henrietta 62.5% 1.7% (+60.8)#1 1.9% (+60.6)#12
2. Raynham 26.7% 1.7% (+25.0)#2 1.9% (+24.8)#70
3. Jackson Springs 20.4% 1.7% (+18.7)#3 1.9% (+18.5)#102
4. Robbins 17.9% 1.7% (+16.2)#4 1.9% (+16.0)#136
5. Governors 13.5% 1.7% (+11.8)#5 1.9% (+11.6)#234
6. Woodland 13.5% 1.7% (+11.8)#6 1.9% (+11.6)#235
7. Rodanthe 12.5% 1.7% (+10.8)#7 1.9% (+10.6)#272
8. Silver Lake 11.9% 1.7% (+10.3)#8 1.9% (+10.0)#293
9. Pink Hill 11.6% 1.7% (+9.98)#9 1.9% (+9.75)#306
10. Belville 10.8% 1.7% (+9.15)#10 1.9% (+8.92)#341
11. Falcon 10.7% 1.7% (+9.05)#11 1.9% (+8.82)#347
12. Sea Breeze 10.0% 1.7% (+8.37)#12 1.9% (+8.13)#386
13. Boardman 10.0% 1.7% (+8.33)#13 1.9% (+8.10)#392
14. Cypress Landing 8.2% 1.7% (+6.55)#14 1.9% (+6.32)#553
15. Seven Devils 7.2% 1.7% (+5.52)#15 1.9% (+5.28)#725
16. Hamilton 7.1% 1.7% (+5.48)#16 1.9% (+5.24)#732
17. Efland 7.0% 1.7% (+5.34)#17 1.9% (+5.11)#771
18. Parkton 6.6% 1.7% (+4.90)#18 1.9% (+4.67)#870
19. Peletier 6.5% 1.7% (+4.79)#19 1.9% (+4.55)#889
20. Godwin 6.2% 1.7% (+4.58)#20 1.9% (+4.35)#951
21. Aquadale 6.2% 1.7% (+4.56)#21 1.9% (+4.33)#958
22. Bent Creek 6.2% 1.7% (+4.50)#22 1.9% (+4.27)#974
23. Carolina Shores 5.7% 1.7% (+4.04)#23 1.9% (+3.80)#1,139
24. Blowing Rock 5.4% 1.7% (+3.76)#24 1.9% (+3.53)#1,256
25. Sylva 5.4% 1.7% (+3.75)#25 1.9% (+3.52)#1,260
26. Avery Creek 5.1% 1.7% (+3.46)#26 1.9% (+3.23)#1,389
27. New London 5.0% 1.7% (+3.36)#27 1.9% (+3.13)#1,455
28. Pantego 5.0% 1.7% (+3.28)#28 1.9% (+3.05)#1,506
29. Gaston 4.9% 1.7% (+3.28)#29 1.9% (+3.05)#1,508
30. Cedar Rock 4.9% 1.7% (+3.20)#30 1.9% (+2.97)#1,553
31. Spout Springs 4.9% 1.7% (+3.20)#31 1.9% (+2.96)#1,557
32. Deercroft 4.8% 1.7% (+3.16)#32 1.9% (+2.93)#1,577
33. Myrtle Grove 4.7% 1.7% (+3.04)#33 1.9% (+2.81)#1,639
34. Arrowhead Beach 4.7% 1.7% (+3.00)#34 1.9% (+2.77)#1,660
35. Dover 4.7% 1.7% (+3.00)#35 1.9% (+2.76)#1,664
36. Ayden 4.5% 1.7% (+2.83)#36 1.9% (+2.60)#1,785
37. White Lake 4.5% 1.7% (+2.79)#37 1.9% (+2.56)#1,812
38. Linden 4.4% 1.7% (+2.78)#38 1.9% (+2.55)#1,829
39. Cordova 4.4% 1.7% (+2.74)#39 1.9% (+2.51)#1,859
40. Horse Shoe 4.4% 1.7% (+2.69)#40 1.9% (+2.46)#1,901
41. Franklinton 4.4% 1.7% (+2.69)#41 1.9% (+2.46)#1,903
42. Kelford 4.3% 1.7% (+2.64)#42 1.9% (+2.41)#1,934
43. Fairfield Harbour 4.3% 1.7% (+2.59)#43 1.9% (+2.36)#1,979
44. Flat Rock 4.2% 1.7% (+2.56)#44 1.9% (+2.33)#2,011
45. Holly Springs 4.2% 1.7% (+2.56)#45 1.9% (+2.33)#2,012
46. Rutherford College 4.2% 1.7% (+2.56)#46 1.9% (+2.32)#2,020
47. Apex 4.2% 1.7% (+2.52)#47 1.9% (+2.29)#2,048
48. Louisburg 4.1% 1.7% (+2.43)#48 1.9% (+2.20)#2,125
49. Jefferson 4.1% 1.7% (+2.41)#49 1.9% (+2.18)#2,156
50. Midway 4.0% 1.7% (+2.38)#50 1.9% (+2.15)#2,177
51. Bear Grass 4.0% 1.7% (+2.33)#51 1.9% (+2.10)#2,223
52. Youngsville 4.0% 1.7% (+2.30)#52 1.9% (+2.06)#2,260
53. Wrightsville Beach 3.9% 1.7% (+2.28)#53 1.9% (+2.05)#2,287
54. Porters Neck 3.9% 1.7% (+2.27)#54 1.9% (+2.03)#2,299
55. Creedmoor 3.9% 1.7% (+2.24)#55 1.9% (+2.01)#2,328
56. Belmont 3.9% 1.7% (+2.22)#56 1.9% (+1.99)#2,356
57. Whiteville 3.9% 1.7% (+2.20)#57 1.9% (+1.96)#2,393
58. La Grange 3.8% 1.7% (+2.18)#58 1.9% (+1.95)#2,402
59. Briar Chapel 3.8% 1.7% (+2.17)#59 1.9% (+1.94)#2,411
60. Williamston 3.8% 1.7% (+2.13)#60 1.9% (+1.90)#2,448
61. Elroy 3.8% 1.7% (+2.10)#61 1.9% (+1.87)#2,497
62. Warrenton 3.7% 1.7% (+2.04)#62 1.9% (+1.81)#2,574
63. Northchase 3.7% 1.7% (+2.01)#63 1.9% (+1.78)#2,613
64. Garner 3.7% 1.7% (+2.00)#64 1.9% (+1.76)#2,635
65. Southern Pines 3.5% 1.7% (+1.86)#65 1.9% (+1.63)#2,798
66. Sugar Mountain 3.5% 1.7% (+1.83)#66 1.9% (+1.60)#2,842
67. Dublin 3.5% 1.7% (+1.81)#67 1.9% (+1.57)#2,868
68. Mcadenville 3.5% 1.7% (+1.80)#68 1.9% (+1.56)#2,887
69. Grantsboro 3.4% 1.7% (+1.75)#69 1.9% (+1.52)#2,940
70. Greenevers 3.4% 1.7% (+1.74)#70 1.9% (+1.51)#2,959
71. Jacksonville 3.4% 1.7% (+1.72)#71 1.9% (+1.49)#2,983
72. Winterville 3.3% 1.7% (+1.66)#72 1.9% (+1.43)#3,076
73. Mint Hill 3.3% 1.7% (+1.65)#73 1.9% (+1.41)#3,101
74. South Henderson 3.3% 1.7% (+1.64)#74 1.9% (+1.41)#3,104
75. Leland 3.3% 1.7% (+1.64)#75 1.9% (+1.41)#3,108
76. Fallston 3.3% 1.7% (+1.63)#76 1.9% (+1.39)#3,135
77. Cramerton 3.2% 1.7% (+1.56)#77 1.9% (+1.33)#3,216
78. North Topsail Beach 3.2% 1.7% (+1.56)#78 1.9% (+1.33)#3,222
79. Seagrove 3.2% 1.7% (+1.53)#79 1.9% (+1.29)#3,282
80. Archer Lodge 3.1% 1.7% (+1.48)#80 1.9% (+1.25)#3,381
81. Canton 3.1% 1.7% (+1.47)#81 1.9% (+1.23)#3,408
82. Mount Holly 3.1% 1.7% (+1.41)#82 1.9% (+1.18)#3,498
83. Stallings 3.1% 1.7% (+1.41)#83 1.9% (+1.17)#3,518
84. Bolivia 3.0% 1.7% (+1.36)#84 1.9% (+1.13)#3,604
85. Wallburg 3.0% 1.7% (+1.32)#85 1.9% (+1.09)#3,688
86. Cary 3.0% 1.7% (+1.31)#86 1.9% (+1.08)#3,712
87. Frisco 3.0% 1.7% (+1.30)#87 1.9% (+1.07)#3,725
88. Oriental 3.0% 1.7% (+1.29)#88 1.9% (+1.06)#3,754
89. Waxhaw 2.9% 1.7% (+1.26)#89 1.9% (+1.03)#3,798
90. Biscoe 2.9% 1.7% (+1.25)#90 1.9% (+1.02)#3,808
91. Cornelius 2.9% 1.7% (+1.25)#91 1.9% (+1.02)#3,826
92. Morrisville 2.9% 1.7% (+1.21)#92 1.9% (+0.974)#3,929
93. South Rosemary 2.9% 1.7% (+1.20)#93 1.9% (+0.966)#3,943
94. Salisbury 2.9% 1.7% (+1.19)#94 1.9% (+0.959)#3,953
95. Vanceboro 2.9% 1.7% (+1.19)#95 1.9% (+0.959)#3,956
96. Conover 2.8% 1.7% (+1.18)#96 1.9% (+0.947)#3,991
97. Matthews 2.8% 1.7% (+1.18)#97 1.9% (+0.945)#3,994
98. Lake Lure 2.8% 1.7% (+1.16)#98 1.9% (+0.930)#4,021
99. Rolesville 2.8% 1.7% (+1.15)#99 1.9% (+0.921)#4,041
100. Lowell 2.8% 1.7% (+1.14)#100 1.9% (+0.903)#4,082

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Information in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Information in North Carolina are:
#1
62.5%
#2
26.7%
#3
17.9%
#4
13.5%
#5
12.5%
#6
11.9%
#7
11.6%
#8
10.8%
#9
10.7%
#10
10.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Information in North Carolina?
Henrietta has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Information in North Carolina with 62.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Information in the State of North Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Information in North Carolina is 1.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Information in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Information in the United States is 1.9%.