Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Father
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina

50.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina

City Single Father Poverty vs State vs National
1. Huntersville 0.33% 16.3% (-16.0)#1 13.7% (-13.4)#2
2. Green Level 3.0% 16.3% (-13.3)#2 13.7% (-10.7)#192
3. Erwin 3.3% 16.3% (-13.0)#3 13.7% (-10.4)#232
4. Kannapolis 3.5% 16.3% (-12.9)#4 13.7% (-10.2)#241
5. Norwood 3.6% 16.3% (-12.7)#5 13.7% (-10.1)#257
6. Holly Springs 3.7% 16.3% (-12.7)#6 13.7% (-10.0)#269
7. Raleigh 3.7% 16.3% (-12.6)#7 13.7% (-9.98)#275
8. Mooresville 4.0% 16.3% (-12.4)#8 13.7% (-9.75)#297
9. Asheville 4.5% 16.3% (-11.9)#9 13.7% (-9.23)#370
10. Jonesville 4.5% 16.3% (-11.8)#10 13.7% (-9.17)#379
11. Concord 5.4% 16.3% (-10.9)#11 13.7% (-8.28)#498
12. Waxhaw 6.3% 16.3% (-10.0)#12 13.7% (-7.39)#618
13. Apex 6.4% 16.3% (-9.93)#13 13.7% (-7.30)#633
14. Cherryville 6.5% 16.3% (-9.80)#14 13.7% (-7.17)#649
15. Tobaccoville 7.1% 16.3% (-9.20)#15 13.7% (-6.57)#737
16. Dunn 7.2% 16.3% (-9.10)#16 13.7% (-6.47)#758
17. Matthews 7.4% 16.3% (-8.97)#17 13.7% (-6.34)#782
18. Chapel Hill 7.5% 16.3% (-8.86)#18 13.7% (-6.23)#803
19. Mount Airy 7.6% 16.3% (-8.75)#19 13.7% (-6.12)#818
20. Albemarle 7.6% 16.3% (-8.73)#20 13.7% (-6.10)#821
21. Wilmington 7.9% 16.3% (-8.45)#21 13.7% (-5.82)#889
22. Mount Holly 9.4% 16.3% (-6.94)#22 13.7% (-4.31)#1,127
23. Indian Trail 9.8% 16.3% (-6.51)#23 13.7% (-3.88)#1,192
24. Cary 10.3% 16.3% (-6.04)#24 13.7% (-3.41)#1,274
25. Asheboro 10.7% 16.3% (-5.60)#25 13.7% (-2.97)#1,344
26. Mint Hill 11.0% 16.3% (-5.30)#26 13.7% (-2.67)#1,392
27. Charlotte 11.8% 16.3% (-4.53)#27 13.7% (-1.90)#1,507
28. Jacksonville 11.8% 16.3% (-4.50)#28 13.7% (-1.87)#1,511
29. Washington 13.1% 16.3% (-3.25)#29 13.7% (-0.617)#1,715
30. Greensboro 13.6% 16.3% (-2.71)#30 13.7% (-0.081)#1,796
31. Raeford 13.6% 16.3% (-2.71)#31 13.7% (-0.076)#1,802
32. Emma 13.8% 16.3% (-2.59)#32 13.7% (+0.038)#1,829
33. Anderson Creek 14.0% 16.3% (-2.36)#33 13.7% (+0.266)#1,861
34. Oak Island 14.0% 16.3% (-2.31)#34 13.7% (+0.323)#1,866
35. Goldsboro 14.2% 16.3% (-2.11)#35 13.7% (+0.520)#1,884
36. Coats 14.3% 16.3% (-2.06)#36 13.7% (+0.573)#1,908
37. Henderson 15.0% 16.3% (-1.36)#37 13.7% (+1.27)#2,008
38. Sanford 15.5% 16.3% (-0.834)#38 13.7% (+1.80)#2,083
39. Fuquay Varina 16.0% 16.3% (-0.385)#39 13.7% (+2.25)#2,148
40. Burgaw 16.1% 16.3% (-0.271)#40 13.7% (+2.36)#2,163
41. Winterville 16.7% 16.3% (+0.324)#41 13.7% (+2.95)#2,233
42. St Stephens 16.9% 16.3% (+0.541)#42 13.7% (+3.17)#2,311
43. High Point 17.2% 16.3% (+0.812)#43 13.7% (+3.44)#2,338
44. Monroe 17.6% 16.3% (+1.26)#44 13.7% (+3.89)#2,394
45. Atkinson 17.6% 16.3% (+1.30)#45 13.7% (+3.93)#2,406
46. Durham 17.9% 16.3% (+1.59)#46 13.7% (+4.22)#2,428
47. Wilson 18.0% 16.3% (+1.64)#47 13.7% (+4.27)#2,434
48. Sparta 18.2% 16.3% (+1.84)#48 13.7% (+4.47)#2,464
49. Star 18.2% 16.3% (+1.84)#49 13.7% (+4.47)#2,471
50. Salisbury 18.4% 16.3% (+2.06)#50 13.7% (+4.69)#2,502
51. Hope Mills 18.6% 16.3% (+2.25)#51 13.7% (+4.88)#2,523
52. Fayetteville 19.1% 16.3% (+2.73)#52 13.7% (+5.36)#2,596
53. Pembroke 19.2% 16.3% (+2.89)#53 13.7% (+5.52)#2,609
54. Rocky Mount 19.5% 16.3% (+3.16)#54 13.7% (+5.79)#2,640
55. Burlington 19.7% 16.3% (+3.37)#55 13.7% (+6.00)#2,667
56. Thomasville 19.8% 16.3% (+3.41)#56 13.7% (+6.04)#2,671
57. Carolina Beach 19.8% 16.3% (+3.41)#57 13.7% (+6.04)#2,672
58. Lexington 19.8% 16.3% (+3.46)#58 13.7% (+6.09)#2,678
59. Clayton 19.9% 16.3% (+3.58)#59 13.7% (+6.21)#2,688
60. Wagram 20.0% 16.3% (+3.66)#60 13.7% (+6.29)#2,729
61. Enochville 20.4% 16.3% (+4.03)#61 13.7% (+6.66)#2,789
62. Morehead City 20.7% 16.3% (+4.35)#62 13.7% (+6.98)#2,816
63. Gastonia 20.7% 16.3% (+4.40)#63 13.7% (+7.03)#2,829
64. Rutherford College 21.6% 16.3% (+5.23)#64 13.7% (+7.86)#2,936
65. Sedalia 22.2% 16.3% (+5.88)#65 13.7% (+8.51)#3,020
66. Marion 22.8% 16.3% (+6.46)#66 13.7% (+9.09)#3,079
67. Davidson 22.9% 16.3% (+6.51)#67 13.7% (+9.14)#3,080
68. New Bern 23.1% 16.3% (+6.72)#68 13.7% (+9.35)#3,091
69. Candor 23.1% 16.3% (+6.73)#69 13.7% (+9.36)#3,107
70. Hickory 23.3% 16.3% (+6.92)#70 13.7% (+9.55)#3,129
71. St Pauls 25.0% 16.3% (+8.66)#71 13.7% (+11.3)#3,275
72. Newton 25.1% 16.3% (+8.79)#72 13.7% (+11.4)#3,337
73. Waynesville 25.7% 16.3% (+9.33)#73 13.7% (+12.0)#3,377
74. Siler City 25.7% 16.3% (+9.37)#74 13.7% (+12.0)#3,378
75. Roanoke Rapids 26.4% 16.3% (+10.0)#75 13.7% (+12.7)#3,435
76. Marshall 26.7% 16.3% (+10.3)#76 13.7% (+13.0)#3,465
77. Spring Hope 26.9% 16.3% (+10.6)#77 13.7% (+13.2)#3,486
78. Vanceboro 27.9% 16.3% (+11.6)#78 13.7% (+14.2)#3,575
79. Winston Salem 28.3% 16.3% (+12.0)#79 13.7% (+14.6)#3,610
80. Garland 28.6% 16.3% (+12.2)#80 13.7% (+14.9)#3,628
81. Greenville 28.9% 16.3% (+12.6)#81 13.7% (+15.2)#3,664
82. Kernersville 29.2% 16.3% (+12.9)#82 13.7% (+15.5)#3,691
83. Marvin 30.0% 16.3% (+13.7)#83 13.7% (+16.3)#3,742
84. Hillsborough 30.3% 16.3% (+14.0)#84 13.7% (+16.6)#3,789
85. Cofield 30.4% 16.3% (+14.1)#85 13.7% (+16.7)#3,804
86. Granite Falls 30.8% 16.3% (+14.4)#86 13.7% (+17.1)#3,827
87. Shelby 30.8% 16.3% (+14.4)#87 13.7% (+17.1)#3,839
88. Lumberton 30.9% 16.3% (+14.6)#88 13.7% (+17.2)#3,848
89. Burnsville 31.1% 16.3% (+14.8)#89 13.7% (+17.4)#3,865
90. Havelock 31.7% 16.3% (+15.4)#90 13.7% (+18.0)#3,908
91. Half Moon 32.1% 16.3% (+15.8)#91 13.7% (+18.4)#3,939
92. Teachey 32.5% 16.3% (+16.2)#92 13.7% (+18.8)#3,965
93. Ruth 33.3% 16.3% (+17.0)#93 13.7% (+19.6)#4,066
94. Wrightsboro 34.7% 16.3% (+18.4)#94 13.7% (+21.0)#4,202
95. Bryson City 36.4% 16.3% (+20.0)#95 13.7% (+22.7)#4,328
96. Rockingham 37.1% 16.3% (+20.8)#96 13.7% (+23.4)#4,380
97. Spring Lake 37.9% 16.3% (+21.6)#97 13.7% (+24.2)#4,438
98. Jefferson 40.8% 16.3% (+24.5)#98 13.7% (+27.1)#4,640
99. Statesville 41.4% 16.3% (+25.0)#99 13.7% (+27.7)#4,667
100. Seaboard 42.1% 16.3% (+25.8)#100 13.7% (+28.4)#4,707

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina are:
What city has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina?
Huntersville has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina with 0.33%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in North Carolina is 16.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States is 13.7%.