Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Carolina

City Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Chinquapin 100.0% 12.0% (+88.0)#1 11.3% (+88.7)#114
2. Old Hundred 77.3% 12.0% (+65.3)#2 11.3% (+66.0)#219
3. Ivanhoe 73.1% 12.0% (+61.1)#3 11.3% (+61.8)#267
4. Cordova 64.8% 12.0% (+52.8)#4 11.3% (+53.5)#392
5. Silver City 64.2% 12.0% (+52.2)#5 11.3% (+52.9)#401
6. Brunswick 63.9% 12.0% (+51.9)#6 11.3% (+52.5)#406
7. Roper 61.1% 12.0% (+49.1)#7 11.3% (+49.8)#468
8. Chadbourn 58.5% 12.0% (+46.5)#8 11.3% (+47.2)#551
9. Roxobel 58.4% 12.0% (+46.4)#9 11.3% (+47.1)#554
10. South Weldon 56.8% 12.0% (+44.8)#10 11.3% (+45.4)#597
11. Boone 56.3% 12.0% (+44.3)#11 11.3% (+44.9)#614
12. Chowan Beach 55.0% 12.0% (+43.0)#12 11.3% (+43.7)#662
13. Light Oak 54.0% 12.0% (+42.0)#13 11.3% (+42.7)#700
14. Norman 53.9% 12.0% (+42.0)#14 11.3% (+42.6)#702
15. Mcfarlan 53.6% 12.0% (+41.6)#15 11.3% (+42.2)#714
16. Cullowhee 53.2% 12.0% (+41.2)#16 11.3% (+41.8)#726
17. Conetoe 53.2% 12.0% (+41.2)#17 11.3% (+41.8)#728
18. Love Valley 50.9% 12.0% (+39.0)#18 11.3% (+39.6)#822
19. Elrod 49.7% 12.0% (+37.7)#19 11.3% (+38.3)#897
20. Middleburg 48.3% 12.0% (+36.3)#20 11.3% (+36.9)#963
21. Fountain 47.9% 12.0% (+35.9)#21 11.3% (+36.6)#982
22. Yanceyville 47.2% 12.0% (+35.2)#22 11.3% (+35.9)#1,030
23. Kelford 46.7% 12.0% (+34.7)#23 11.3% (+35.3)#1,056
24. Sandyfield 46.5% 12.0% (+34.5)#24 11.3% (+35.2)#1,069
25. Maury 46.2% 12.0% (+34.2)#25 11.3% (+34.8)#1,092
26. Scotland Neck 46.0% 12.0% (+34.0)#26 11.3% (+34.7)#1,105
27. East Laurinburg 45.1% 12.0% (+33.1)#27 11.3% (+33.8)#1,153
28. Tar Heel 44.8% 12.0% (+32.8)#28 11.3% (+33.5)#1,163
29. Bridgeton 44.2% 12.0% (+32.2)#29 11.3% (+32.9)#1,208
30. Columbia 43.5% 12.0% (+31.5)#30 11.3% (+32.2)#1,252
31. Fairplains 43.0% 12.0% (+31.0)#31 11.3% (+31.7)#1,290
32. Greenevers 42.9% 12.0% (+30.9)#32 11.3% (+31.6)#1,301
33. Garland 42.6% 12.0% (+30.6)#33 11.3% (+31.3)#1,321
34. South Henderson 42.1% 12.0% (+30.1)#34 11.3% (+30.7)#1,371
35. Bear Grass 41.1% 12.0% (+29.1)#35 11.3% (+29.8)#1,464
36. Hayesville 40.8% 12.0% (+28.8)#36 11.3% (+29.5)#1,500
37. Bonnetsville 40.7% 12.0% (+28.7)#37 11.3% (+29.3)#1,515
38. Godwin 40.0% 12.0% (+28.0)#38 11.3% (+28.7)#1,570
39. Plymouth 39.8% 12.0% (+27.8)#39 11.3% (+28.5)#1,593
40. Ramseur 39.6% 12.0% (+27.6)#40 11.3% (+28.2)#1,612
41. Engelhard 39.5% 12.0% (+27.5)#41 11.3% (+28.2)#1,621
42. Bayboro 38.9% 12.0% (+26.9)#42 11.3% (+27.6)#1,680
43. Macclesfield 38.7% 12.0% (+26.7)#43 11.3% (+27.4)#1,711
44. Shannon 38.6% 12.0% (+26.6)#44 11.3% (+27.3)#1,722
45. Buies Creek 38.1% 12.0% (+26.1)#45 11.3% (+26.8)#1,776
46. Momeyer 37.8% 12.0% (+25.8)#46 11.3% (+26.5)#1,798
47. Benson 37.6% 12.0% (+25.6)#47 11.3% (+26.2)#1,830
48. Magnolia 37.3% 12.0% (+25.3)#48 11.3% (+26.0)#1,871
49. Pembroke 37.3% 12.0% (+25.3)#49 11.3% (+25.9)#1,877
50. Chocowinity 36.6% 12.0% (+24.6)#50 11.3% (+25.2)#1,952
51. Red Springs 36.5% 12.0% (+24.6)#51 11.3% (+25.2)#1,957
52. Belvoir 36.5% 12.0% (+24.5)#52 11.3% (+25.2)#1,959
53. Maxton 36.3% 12.0% (+24.3)#53 11.3% (+24.9)#1,993
54. Hiddenite 36.3% 12.0% (+24.3)#54 11.3% (+24.9)#1,997
55. Vander 35.6% 12.0% (+23.6)#55 11.3% (+24.2)#2,076
56. Jaars 35.4% 12.0% (+23.5)#56 11.3% (+24.1)#2,085
57. La Grange 34.8% 12.0% (+22.8)#57 11.3% (+23.5)#2,176
58. Tabor City 34.7% 12.0% (+22.8)#58 11.3% (+23.4)#2,185
59. Forest City 34.7% 12.0% (+22.7)#59 11.3% (+23.3)#2,194
60. Hightsville 34.6% 12.0% (+22.6)#60 11.3% (+23.3)#2,201
61. St Pauls 34.6% 12.0% (+22.6)#61 11.3% (+23.2)#2,209
62. Enfield 34.3% 12.0% (+22.3)#62 11.3% (+23.0)#2,250
63. Gibson 33.9% 12.0% (+21.9)#63 11.3% (+22.6)#2,297
64. Wilson S Mills 33.8% 12.0% (+21.8)#64 11.3% (+22.4)#2,312
65. Arrowhead Beach 33.7% 12.0% (+21.7)#65 11.3% (+22.4)#2,325
66. Pink Hill 33.4% 12.0% (+21.5)#66 11.3% (+22.1)#2,362
67. Brogden 33.4% 12.0% (+21.4)#67 11.3% (+22.1)#2,365
68. Burnsville 33.4% 12.0% (+21.4)#68 11.3% (+22.0)#2,366
69. Marietta 33.3% 12.0% (+21.3)#69 11.3% (+22.0)#2,383
70. Bolton 33.2% 12.0% (+21.2)#70 11.3% (+21.9)#2,412
71. Saratoga 33.1% 12.0% (+21.1)#71 11.3% (+21.8)#2,421
72. Faison 32.9% 12.0% (+20.9)#72 11.3% (+21.6)#2,463
73. Robbins 32.9% 12.0% (+20.9)#73 11.3% (+21.5)#2,468
74. Badin 32.7% 12.0% (+20.7)#74 11.3% (+21.3)#2,494
75. Laurel Hill 32.0% 12.0% (+20.0)#75 11.3% (+20.6)#2,609
76. Elizabethtown 31.9% 12.0% (+19.9)#76 11.3% (+20.5)#2,629
77. Laurinburg 31.4% 12.0% (+19.4)#77 11.3% (+20.0)#2,720
78. Taylorsville 31.3% 12.0% (+19.3)#78 11.3% (+20.0)#2,724
79. Randleman 31.2% 12.0% (+19.2)#79 11.3% (+19.8)#2,756
80. Lilesville 30.7% 12.0% (+18.7)#80 11.3% (+19.3)#2,846
81. Rocky Point 30.3% 12.0% (+18.3)#81 11.3% (+19.0)#2,908
82. Mount Olive 30.3% 12.0% (+18.3)#82 11.3% (+19.0)#2,915
83. Fairmont 30.3% 12.0% (+18.3)#83 11.3% (+18.9)#2,917
84. Northchase 30.0% 12.0% (+18.0)#84 11.3% (+18.6)#2,994
85. Snow Hill 29.5% 12.0% (+17.5)#85 11.3% (+18.2)#3,082
86. Harrells 29.4% 12.0% (+17.4)#86 11.3% (+18.1)#3,105
87. Lucama 29.3% 12.0% (+17.4)#87 11.3% (+18.0)#3,128
88. Williamston 29.3% 12.0% (+17.3)#88 11.3% (+18.0)#3,131
89. Rich Square 29.2% 12.0% (+17.2)#89 11.3% (+17.9)#3,154
90. Roxboro 28.8% 12.0% (+16.9)#90 11.3% (+17.5)#3,245
91. Mount Airy 28.8% 12.0% (+16.8)#91 11.3% (+17.5)#3,248
92. Weldon 28.7% 12.0% (+16.7)#92 11.3% (+17.4)#3,261
93. Louisburg 28.4% 12.0% (+16.4)#93 11.3% (+17.0)#3,361
94. Biscoe 28.3% 12.0% (+16.3)#94 11.3% (+16.9)#3,387
95. South Mills 28.0% 12.0% (+16.0)#95 11.3% (+16.6)#3,449
96. Morganton 27.7% 12.0% (+15.7)#96 11.3% (+16.4)#3,521
97. Frisco 27.6% 12.0% (+15.6)#97 11.3% (+16.2)#3,546
98. Robbinsville 27.6% 12.0% (+15.6)#98 11.3% (+16.2)#3,553
99. Edenton 27.3% 12.0% (+15.3)#99 11.3% (+16.0)#3,612
100. Clarkton 27.2% 12.0% (+15.2)#100 11.3% (+15.8)#3,652

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Carolina are:
#1
77.3%
#2
73.1%
#3
64.8%
#4
64.2%
#5
63.9%
#6
61.1%
#7
58.5%
#8
58.4%
#9
56.8%
#10
56.3%
What city has the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Carolina?
Old Hundred has the Highest Male Poverty Level in North Carolina with 77.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Males in North Carolina is 12.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Males in the United States is 11.3%.