Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Physical and Health Sciences
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in North Carolina

City % Graduates vs State vs National
1. Hallsboro 100.0% 3.1% (+96.9)#1 3.1% (+96.9)#15
2. Boardman 72.7% 3.1% (+69.6)#2 3.1% (+69.6)#33
3. Ingold 44.0% 3.1% (+40.9)#3 3.1% (+40.9)#119
4. Mcfarlan 33.3% 3.1% (+30.2)#4 3.1% (+30.2)#210
5. Fallston 29.6% 3.1% (+26.5)#5 3.1% (+26.5)#268
6. Mount Gilead 28.9% 3.1% (+25.8)#6 3.1% (+25.8)#279
7. Salvo 26.5% 3.1% (+23.4)#7 3.1% (+23.4)#333
8. Hot Springs 25.5% 3.1% (+22.3)#8 3.1% (+22.4)#356
9. Conetoe 25.0% 3.1% (+21.9)#9 3.1% (+21.9)#362
10. Linden 23.5% 3.1% (+20.4)#10 3.1% (+20.4)#425
11. Misenheimer 23.3% 3.1% (+20.1)#11 3.1% (+20.2)#434
12. Gamewell 21.3% 3.1% (+18.2)#12 3.1% (+18.2)#496
13. Davis 21.1% 3.1% (+18.0)#13 3.1% (+18.0)#502
14. Cofield 20.4% 3.1% (+17.3)#14 3.1% (+17.3)#523
15. Bald Head Island 18.9% 3.1% (+15.8)#15 3.1% (+15.8)#591
16. Stedman 18.8% 3.1% (+15.7)#16 3.1% (+15.7)#601
17. Elm City 18.8% 3.1% (+15.6)#17 3.1% (+15.7)#604
18. Staley 18.2% 3.1% (+15.1)#18 3.1% (+15.1)#629
19. Chowan Beach 17.5% 3.1% (+14.4)#19 3.1% (+14.4)#668
20. Saratoga 17.4% 3.1% (+14.3)#20 3.1% (+14.3)#680
21. Welcome 16.9% 3.1% (+13.8)#21 3.1% (+13.8)#701
22. Cape Colony 16.5% 3.1% (+13.4)#22 3.1% (+13.4)#748
23. Foscoe 16.1% 3.1% (+13.0)#23 3.1% (+13.0)#781
24. Warsaw 15.7% 3.1% (+12.6)#24 3.1% (+12.6)#807
25. Brogden 15.7% 3.1% (+12.5)#25 3.1% (+12.6)#811
26. Cerro Gordo 15.4% 3.1% (+12.3)#26 3.1% (+12.3)#827
27. Roseboro 15.3% 3.1% (+12.2)#27 3.1% (+12.2)#839
28. Yanceyville 15.2% 3.1% (+12.1)#28 3.1% (+12.1)#851
29. Hays 14.3% 3.1% (+11.2)#29 3.1% (+11.2)#941
30. Lasker 14.3% 3.1% (+11.2)#30 3.1% (+11.2)#964
31. Icard 13.6% 3.1% (+10.5)#31 3.1% (+10.5)#1,027
32. Walnut Creek 13.3% 3.1% (+10.2)#32 3.1% (+10.2)#1,063
33. Franklinville 13.0% 3.1% (+9.93)#33 3.1% (+9.94)#1,090
34. Castalia 13.0% 3.1% (+9.93)#34 3.1% (+9.94)#1,095
35. Highlands 12.7% 3.1% (+9.59)#35 3.1% (+9.60)#1,134
36. Polkton 12.5% 3.1% (+9.39)#36 3.1% (+9.40)#1,152
37. Rutherfordton 12.3% 3.1% (+9.20)#37 3.1% (+9.22)#1,182
38. River Road 12.0% 3.1% (+8.84)#38 3.1% (+8.85)#1,224
39. Hampstead 11.9% 3.1% (+8.84)#39 3.1% (+8.85)#1,225
40. Harkers Island 11.8% 3.1% (+8.71)#40 3.1% (+8.72)#1,242
41. Newport 11.7% 3.1% (+8.63)#41 3.1% (+8.65)#1,260
42. Sawmills 11.7% 3.1% (+8.57)#42 3.1% (+8.58)#1,267
43. Faison 11.6% 3.1% (+8.51)#43 3.1% (+8.53)#1,274
44. Green Level 11.3% 3.1% (+8.23)#44 3.1% (+8.24)#1,321
45. Sylva 11.1% 3.1% (+8.04)#45 3.1% (+8.05)#1,343
46. Teachey 10.3% 3.1% (+7.23)#46 3.1% (+7.25)#1,511
47. Foxfire 10.3% 3.1% (+7.21)#47 3.1% (+7.22)#1,520
48. Bent Creek 10.3% 3.1% (+7.20)#48 3.1% (+7.21)#1,521
49. Lattimore 10.0% 3.1% (+6.89)#49 3.1% (+6.90)#1,597
50. Arrowhead Beach 9.8% 3.1% (+6.67)#50 3.1% (+6.68)#1,655
51. Rennert 9.7% 3.1% (+6.56)#51 3.1% (+6.58)#1,682
52. Bladenboro 9.0% 3.1% (+5.88)#52 3.1% (+5.89)#1,893
53. Rose Hill 8.9% 3.1% (+5.78)#53 3.1% (+5.79)#1,925
54. Raeford 8.9% 3.1% (+5.74)#54 3.1% (+5.75)#1,938
55. Elk Park 8.7% 3.1% (+5.58)#55 3.1% (+5.60)#1,980
56. Marietta 8.3% 3.1% (+5.22)#56 3.1% (+5.23)#2,124
57. Lowesville 8.3% 3.1% (+5.16)#57 3.1% (+5.17)#2,135
58. Princeton 8.3% 3.1% (+5.15)#58 3.1% (+5.16)#2,137
59. Maiden 8.2% 3.1% (+5.08)#59 3.1% (+5.09)#2,152
60. Benson 8.1% 3.1% (+5.02)#60 3.1% (+5.04)#2,174
61. Kitty Hawk 8.1% 3.1% (+4.98)#61 3.1% (+4.99)#2,195
62. Hoopers Creek 8.1% 3.1% (+4.95)#62 3.1% (+4.96)#2,207
63. Biltmore Forest 8.0% 3.1% (+4.90)#63 3.1% (+4.92)#2,222
64. Bessemer City 8.0% 3.1% (+4.89)#64 3.1% (+4.90)#2,230
65. Louisburg 8.0% 3.1% (+4.89)#65 3.1% (+4.90)#2,232
66. Webster 7.9% 3.1% (+4.76)#66 3.1% (+4.77)#2,287
67. Archer Lodge 7.8% 3.1% (+4.70)#67 3.1% (+4.71)#2,322
68. Carrboro 7.7% 3.1% (+4.62)#68 3.1% (+4.64)#2,352
69. Rougemont 7.7% 3.1% (+4.62)#69 3.1% (+4.64)#2,354
70. Trenton 7.7% 3.1% (+4.58)#70 3.1% (+4.59)#2,391
71. Rolesville 7.6% 3.1% (+4.46)#71 3.1% (+4.48)#2,438
72. Creedmoor 7.4% 3.1% (+4.33)#72 3.1% (+4.35)#2,500
73. Simpson 7.3% 3.1% (+4.20)#73 3.1% (+4.22)#2,574
74. Advance 7.3% 3.1% (+4.20)#74 3.1% (+4.21)#2,580
75. Lincolnton 7.3% 3.1% (+4.14)#75 3.1% (+4.15)#2,618
76. Pleasant Garden 7.2% 3.1% (+4.12)#76 3.1% (+4.14)#2,632
77. Midway 7.2% 3.1% (+4.09)#77 3.1% (+4.10)#2,650
78. Glen Raven 7.2% 3.1% (+4.08)#78 3.1% (+4.09)#2,654
79. Carolina Meadows 7.1% 3.1% (+4.00)#79 3.1% (+4.01)#2,719
80. Morrisville 7.1% 3.1% (+3.97)#80 3.1% (+3.99)#2,729
81. Burgaw 7.1% 3.1% (+3.97)#81 3.1% (+3.99)#2,730
82. Sea Breeze 6.9% 3.1% (+3.76)#82 3.1% (+3.78)#2,853
83. Pine Level 6.9% 3.1% (+3.76)#83 3.1% (+3.77)#2,861
84. Gerton 6.9% 3.1% (+3.75)#84 3.1% (+3.76)#2,872
85. Conway 6.8% 3.1% (+3.67)#85 3.1% (+3.68)#2,921
86. Chapel Hill 6.6% 3.1% (+3.52)#86 3.1% (+3.54)#3,014
87. Edneyville 6.6% 3.1% (+3.45)#87 3.1% (+3.47)#3,045
88. Emerald Isle 6.5% 3.1% (+3.41)#88 3.1% (+3.42)#3,066
89. Five Points 6.3% 3.1% (+3.23)#89 3.1% (+3.24)#3,194
90. Swannanoa 6.3% 3.1% (+3.22)#90 3.1% (+3.24)#3,200
91. Seven Lakes 6.3% 3.1% (+3.20)#91 3.1% (+3.21)#3,213
92. Nags Head 6.1% 3.1% (+3.01)#92 3.1% (+3.02)#3,372
93. Dana 6.1% 3.1% (+2.99)#93 3.1% (+3.00)#3,379
94. Marion 6.1% 3.1% (+2.98)#94 3.1% (+2.99)#3,384
95. Springdale 6.1% 3.1% (+2.97)#95 3.1% (+2.98)#3,395
96. Briar Chapel 6.1% 3.1% (+2.95)#96 3.1% (+2.97)#3,400
97. Plain View 6.0% 3.1% (+2.93)#97 3.1% (+2.94)#3,429
98. Fairmont 6.0% 3.1% (+2.92)#98 3.1% (+2.93)#3,435
99. Brices Creek 6.0% 3.1% (+2.87)#99 3.1% (+2.88)#3,474
100. Kings Grant 5.9% 3.1% (+2.82)#100 3.1% (+2.84)#3,514

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in North Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
72.7%
#3
44.0%
#4
33.3%
#5
29.6%
#6
28.9%
#7
26.5%
#8
25.5%
#9
25.0%
#10
23.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in North Carolina?
Hallsboro has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in North Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the State of North Carolina?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in North Carolina is 3.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Physical and Health Sciences in the United States is 3.1%.