Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Accommodation & Food Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in North Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Fontana Dam 100.0% 7.0% (+93.0)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#32
2. Tar Heel 55.6% 7.0% (+48.5)#2 6.9% (+48.7)#114
3. Deercroft 54.4% 7.0% (+47.3)#3 6.9% (+47.5)#118
4. Old Hundred 50.0% 7.0% (+43.0)#4 6.9% (+43.1)#152
5. Hayesville 47.5% 7.0% (+40.4)#5 6.9% (+40.6)#189
6. Dundarrach 47.1% 7.0% (+40.0)#6 6.9% (+40.2)#193
7. Love Valley 46.5% 7.0% (+39.5)#7 6.9% (+39.6)#198
8. Walstonburg 39.8% 7.0% (+32.8)#8 6.9% (+32.9)#269
9. Lattimore 37.4% 7.0% (+30.4)#9 6.9% (+30.5)#305
10. Farmington 34.8% 7.0% (+27.8)#10 6.9% (+27.9)#356
11. Barker Heights 31.7% 7.0% (+24.6)#11 6.9% (+24.8)#425
12. Hot Springs 30.9% 7.0% (+23.8)#12 6.9% (+24.0)#457
13. Coinjock 30.6% 7.0% (+23.5)#13 6.9% (+23.7)#463
14. Powellsville 30.0% 7.0% (+23.0)#14 6.9% (+23.1)#482
15. Elizabethtown 28.6% 7.0% (+21.5)#15 6.9% (+21.7)#531
16. Roxobel 28.4% 7.0% (+21.3)#16 6.9% (+21.5)#546
17. Cherokee 28.2% 7.0% (+21.1)#17 6.9% (+21.3)#554
18. Star 28.1% 7.0% (+21.1)#18 6.9% (+21.3)#557
19. Autryville 26.1% 7.0% (+19.0)#19 6.9% (+19.2)#664
20. Morven 24.7% 7.0% (+17.7)#20 6.9% (+17.9)#759
21. Robbinsville 24.5% 7.0% (+17.4)#21 6.9% (+17.6)#772
22. Dobbins Heights 23.3% 7.0% (+16.2)#22 6.9% (+16.4)#881
23. Clyde 22.9% 7.0% (+15.9)#23 6.9% (+16.0)#918
24. Ocracoke 22.2% 7.0% (+15.1)#24 6.9% (+15.3)#992
25. Sylva 22.1% 7.0% (+15.1)#25 6.9% (+15.3)#996
26. Dudley 22.1% 7.0% (+15.1)#26 6.9% (+15.3)#998
27. Boone 21.8% 7.0% (+14.7)#27 6.9% (+14.9)#1,031
28. West Canton 21.7% 7.0% (+14.6)#28 6.9% (+14.8)#1,042
29. Buies Creek 21.6% 7.0% (+14.5)#29 6.9% (+14.7)#1,052
30. Polkton 21.5% 7.0% (+14.5)#30 6.9% (+14.6)#1,057
31. Bowdens 21.4% 7.0% (+14.3)#31 6.9% (+14.5)#1,072
32. Forest Hills 21.2% 7.0% (+14.2)#32 6.9% (+14.3)#1,094
33. Oriental 21.1% 7.0% (+14.0)#33 6.9% (+14.2)#1,112
34. Four Oaks 20.5% 7.0% (+13.5)#34 6.9% (+13.7)#1,174
35. Murphy 20.5% 7.0% (+13.5)#35 6.9% (+13.6)#1,184
36. Brogden 20.3% 7.0% (+13.2)#36 6.9% (+13.4)#1,209
37. Rutherfordton 20.3% 7.0% (+13.2)#37 6.9% (+13.4)#1,213
38. Roper 20.0% 7.0% (+13.0)#38 6.9% (+13.1)#1,241
39. Emma 19.6% 7.0% (+12.6)#39 6.9% (+12.8)#1,301
40. Jonesville 19.5% 7.0% (+12.4)#40 6.9% (+12.6)#1,330
41. Manns Harbor 19.4% 7.0% (+12.3)#41 6.9% (+12.5)#1,351
42. Banner Elk 19.3% 7.0% (+12.3)#42 6.9% (+12.5)#1,360
43. Salvo 19.3% 7.0% (+12.2)#43 6.9% (+12.4)#1,369
44. Riegelwood 18.9% 7.0% (+11.9)#44 6.9% (+12.1)#1,430
45. Smithfield 18.8% 7.0% (+11.8)#45 6.9% (+11.9)#1,453
46. Ellerbe 18.6% 7.0% (+11.5)#46 6.9% (+11.7)#1,501
47. Vass 18.5% 7.0% (+11.4)#47 6.9% (+11.6)#1,518
48. Bermuda Run 18.4% 7.0% (+11.3)#48 6.9% (+11.5)#1,536
49. Dillsboro 18.3% 7.0% (+11.3)#49 6.9% (+11.5)#1,545
50. Farmville 18.2% 7.0% (+11.2)#50 6.9% (+11.4)#1,574
51. Seven Devils 18.2% 7.0% (+11.2)#51 6.9% (+11.4)#1,575
52. Granite Quarry 18.1% 7.0% (+11.0)#52 6.9% (+11.2)#1,609
53. Elon 18.0% 7.0% (+11.0)#53 6.9% (+11.2)#1,615
54. Yanceyville 18.0% 7.0% (+11.0)#54 6.9% (+11.1)#1,620
55. Ashley Heights 17.8% 7.0% (+10.7)#55 6.9% (+10.9)#1,667
56. Cullowhee 17.5% 7.0% (+10.4)#56 6.9% (+10.6)#1,722
57. Cameron 17.3% 7.0% (+10.2)#57 6.9% (+10.4)#1,774
58. Cliffside 17.2% 7.0% (+10.2)#58 6.9% (+10.4)#1,776
59. Calabash 17.2% 7.0% (+10.1)#59 6.9% (+10.3)#1,799
60. Cricket 17.0% 7.0% (+9.98)#60 6.9% (+10.1)#1,829
61. Maggie Valley 17.0% 7.0% (+9.98)#61 6.9% (+10.1)#1,830
62. Gaston 16.6% 7.0% (+9.56)#62 6.9% (+9.73)#1,927
63. Hatteras 16.6% 7.0% (+9.52)#63 6.9% (+9.69)#1,935
64. Jackson 16.4% 7.0% (+9.39)#64 6.9% (+9.56)#1,970
65. Five Points 16.4% 7.0% (+9.37)#65 6.9% (+9.53)#1,974
66. Valley Hill 16.2% 7.0% (+9.20)#66 6.9% (+9.36)#2,019
67. Jacksonville 16.2% 7.0% (+9.12)#67 6.9% (+9.29)#2,040
68. Topsail Beach 16.1% 7.0% (+9.10)#68 6.9% (+9.26)#2,051
69. Montreat 16.1% 7.0% (+9.01)#69 6.9% (+9.18)#2,086
70. Bryson City 16.0% 7.0% (+8.98)#70 6.9% (+9.15)#2,090
71. Havelock 16.0% 7.0% (+8.92)#71 6.9% (+9.09)#2,109
72. Belvoir 15.9% 7.0% (+8.86)#72 6.9% (+9.03)#2,135
73. Barnardsville 15.7% 7.0% (+8.60)#73 6.9% (+8.77)#2,214
74. East Flat Rock 15.6% 7.0% (+8.51)#74 6.9% (+8.68)#2,253
75. Ruffin 15.3% 7.0% (+8.24)#75 6.9% (+8.41)#2,335
76. Woodfin 15.2% 7.0% (+8.13)#76 6.9% (+8.30)#2,364
77. Asheville 15.2% 7.0% (+8.13)#77 6.9% (+8.30)#2,365
78. Badin 15.2% 7.0% (+8.12)#78 6.9% (+8.28)#2,370
79. Bolivia 15.2% 7.0% (+8.10)#79 6.9% (+8.27)#2,377
80. South Mills 15.0% 7.0% (+7.97)#80 6.9% (+8.13)#2,437
81. Princeville 14.9% 7.0% (+7.90)#81 6.9% (+8.06)#2,469
82. Patterson Springs 14.9% 7.0% (+7.86)#82 6.9% (+8.03)#2,484
83. Windsor 14.8% 7.0% (+7.77)#83 6.9% (+7.94)#2,511
84. Kill Devil Hills 14.8% 7.0% (+7.73)#84 6.9% (+7.90)#2,527
85. Linville 14.7% 7.0% (+7.69)#85 6.9% (+7.86)#2,539
86. Benson 14.6% 7.0% (+7.56)#86 6.9% (+7.73)#2,589
87. Wingate 14.6% 7.0% (+7.52)#87 6.9% (+7.69)#2,613
88. Blowing Rock 14.5% 7.0% (+7.49)#88 6.9% (+7.65)#2,626
89. Dover 14.5% 7.0% (+7.46)#89 6.9% (+7.63)#2,635
90. Rich Square 14.5% 7.0% (+7.45)#90 6.9% (+7.62)#2,636
91. Scotland Neck 14.4% 7.0% (+7.36)#91 6.9% (+7.53)#2,675
92. Kure Beach 14.4% 7.0% (+7.33)#92 6.9% (+7.50)#2,687
93. Sedalia 14.3% 7.0% (+7.29)#93 6.9% (+7.46)#2,698
94. Mountain Home 14.3% 7.0% (+7.27)#94 6.9% (+7.44)#2,704
95. Kittrell 14.3% 7.0% (+7.24)#95 6.9% (+7.40)#2,738
96. Macclesfield 14.2% 7.0% (+7.13)#96 6.9% (+7.30)#2,789
97. Snow Hill 14.1% 7.0% (+7.02)#97 6.9% (+7.19)#2,825
98. Sparta 13.9% 7.0% (+6.84)#98 6.9% (+7.01)#2,895
99. Eureka 13.8% 7.0% (+6.78)#99 6.9% (+6.95)#2,926
100. Landis 13.8% 7.0% (+6.72)#100 6.9% (+6.89)#2,958

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in North Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
55.6%
#3
54.4%
#4
50.0%
#5
47.5%
#6
47.1%
#7
46.5%
#8
39.8%
#9
37.4%
#10
31.7%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in North Carolina?
Fontana Dam has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in North Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the State of North Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in North Carolina is 7.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Accommodation & Food Services in the United States is 6.9%.