Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Immigrants from Ghana

Fair
Poor
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,702,022 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.769. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 28.8 Immigrants from Ghana.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.5%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $81,489, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $58,624, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $51,333, a difference of 0.74%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $87,760, a difference of 0.78%), and median family income ($94,429 compared to $96,544, a difference of 2.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Ghana
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Tragic
$41,131
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Tragic
$96,544
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Tragic
$81,489
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Fair
$45,641
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Tragic
$51,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Good
$39,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Poor
$51,333
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Tragic
$87,760
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Tragic
$94,982
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Tragic
$58,624
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
22.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.7%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Ghana
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 70.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 64.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Ghana
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Ghana
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Good
82.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.5%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.65%), family households (61.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Ghana
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
42.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Tragic
34.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.0%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 16.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Ghana
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
16.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Tragic
83.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Tragic
47.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
16.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
5.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 77.7%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Ghana
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
89.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
87.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Tragic
63.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
57.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Poor
44.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Fair
36.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Fair
1.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 107.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.3%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.47%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Ghana
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Tragic
24.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Poor
2.5%