Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,633,985 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.701% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 2,700.7 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $45,043, a difference of 15.0%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $87,553, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $103,584, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,976, a difference of 0.57%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $52,374, a difference of 1.3%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 41.6%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and female poverty (14.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 83.8%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 82.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.81%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.95%), and family households (61.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 56.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.9%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 43.8%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and 2nd grade (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 85.9%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.9%).