Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ukrainian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Ukrainians

Fair
Excellent
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,528
SOCIAL INDEX
82.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
66th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ukrainian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,051,909 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Ukrainians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Ukrainians.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Ukrainian Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $48,014, a difference of 22.6%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $59,728, a difference of 20.1%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $91,456, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $63,032, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $53,843, a difference of 4.1%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanUkrainian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Exceptional
$48,014
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Exceptional
$111,368
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$91,456
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Exceptional
$50,320
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Exceptional
$59,728
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Exceptional
$42,015
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$53,843
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$102,451
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$108,475
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Excellent
$63,032
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 51.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 39.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.1%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanUkrainian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
19.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 94.8%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 90.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 87.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanUkrainian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanUkrainian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Poor
64.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.9%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (61.8% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.14, a difference of 4.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanUkrainian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
48.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
29.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 45.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 11.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanUkrainian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Fair
10.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Average
19.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Average
6.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 45.7%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 41.9%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanUkrainian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
40.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.2%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Ukrainian Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanUkrainian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Fair
2.5%