Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

New Zealanders

Fair
Excellent
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,735,584 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.136% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 136.0 New Zealanders.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in New Zealander Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $50,575, a difference of 29.1%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $95,146, a difference of 24.6%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $61,199, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $53,294, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $67,333, a difference of 8.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 46.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanNew Zealander
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 95.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 92.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 91.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanNew Zealander
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Fair
82.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 61.5%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (61.8% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanNew Zealander
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Excellent
30.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 53.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
6.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 57.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 56.5%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 67.5%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.90%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 16.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanNew Zealander
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%