Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,647,668 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.737. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 22.7 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $52,085, a difference of 19.7%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and median family income ($94,429 compared to $88,267, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($76,383 compared to $76,784, a difference of 0.52%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $89,108, a difference of 2.1%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $38,065, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 49.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.22%), male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 92.5%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 91.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 91.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 42.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.0%), family households (61.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.68%), divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 57.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 109.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 99.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 66.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 11.8%).