Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Turks

Fair
Exceptional
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Turkish Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,104,054 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.519. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 40.7 Turks.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Turkish Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $52,391, a difference of 33.8%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $99,389, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $117,814, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $54,266, a difference of 4.9%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $68,037, a difference of 9.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanTurkish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Exceptional
$52,391
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Exceptional
$121,202
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$99,389
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Exceptional
$53,919
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Exceptional
$64,253
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Exceptional
$44,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$54,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$110,318
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$117,814
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Exceptional
$68,037
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 67.7%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 54.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.0%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanTurkish
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
18.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 101.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 97.6%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 97.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanTurkish
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 27.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanTurkish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 70.8%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.46%), family households (61.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanTurkish
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
27.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.7%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanTurkish
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
5.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 72.0%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 63.1%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.13%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanTurkish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
70.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
65.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
46.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
19.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 89.2%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 18.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Turkish Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanTurkish
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%