Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,735,523 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.812. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 44.2 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $52,217, a difference of 33.3%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $94,846, a difference of 24.2%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $61,628, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $50,984, a difference of 1.4%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $66,118, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 50.0%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 88.2%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 87.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 80.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.5%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.44%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 62.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 58.0%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 67.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 48.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.6%).