Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,598,749 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.206% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 206.0 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $58,353, a difference of 49.0%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $110,428, a difference of 44.6%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $71,348, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $56,835, a difference of 9.9%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $72,963, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 76.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 72.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 108.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 100.8%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 100.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 34.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 80.8%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 47.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.87%), family households (61.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.1%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 114.6%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 103.5%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 102.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.30%), 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 100.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 76.4%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.8%).