Alaskan Athabascan vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,541,820 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 38.6 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.4%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $83,582, a difference of 9.4%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $42,164, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $52,594, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $90,137, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $60,043, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 32.9%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.84%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 71.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 67.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.5%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.62%), family households (61.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple households (43.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 53.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.8%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.5%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 34.2%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 108.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.6%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%).