Alaskan Athabascan vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,842,443 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 42.1 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($76,383 compared to $89,919, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $105,149, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $71,021, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $38,461, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($43,393 compared to $45,027, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 92.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 86.4%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 73.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.3%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and married-couple households (43.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.43, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 102.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (36.5% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 18.2%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.4%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.88%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.8%).