Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Portuguese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Portuguese

Fair
Average
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Portuguese Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,576,978 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 57.7 Portuguese.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Portuguese Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($76,383 compared to $88,976, a difference of 16.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $105,309, a difference of 15.8%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $56,663, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,440, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $54,436, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $40,177, a difference of 6.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanPortuguese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Good
$44,362
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Excellent
$106,286
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$88,976
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Exceptional
$48,032
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Excellent
$56,663
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Good
$40,177
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$54,436
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$99,429
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$105,309
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Good
$61,440
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 40.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 32.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.78%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanPortuguese
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Excellent
20.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Fair
12.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 78.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 77.9%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 76.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanPortuguese
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanPortuguese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Fair
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
82.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.5%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.30%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 6.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanPortuguese
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Tragic
33.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 82.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.56%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 6.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanPortuguese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
91.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.9%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.87%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanPortuguese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Poor
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
92.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Tragic
63.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
44.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Poor
13.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Fair
1.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 53.9%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Portuguese Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanPortuguese
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Fair
23.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Fair
47.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%