Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,765,633 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 39.1 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($76,383 compared to $91,887, a difference of 20.3%), per capita income ($39,163 compared to $46,938, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $108,471, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $50,729, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $64,521, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 56.5%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 79.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 76.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 28.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 68.1%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 48.9%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.30, a difference of 0.93%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (61.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 85.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.3%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 51.4%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.79%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 81.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 56.3%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 13.3%).