Alaskan Athabascan vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,376,442 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.999. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.200% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 200.1 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 50.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $44,822, a difference of 39.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $72,093, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $50,547, a difference of 1.6%), median earnings ($43,393 compared to $38,949, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $77,044, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 48.9%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 47.8%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 71.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 50.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 23.4%), single father households (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.6%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.0%), married-couple households (43.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 64.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.6%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 36.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 90.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 79.0%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 42.7%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 34.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.1%).