Alaskan Athabascan vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,724,496 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 20.3 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 33.4%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $55,327, a difference of 12.7%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $40,958, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($94,429 compared to $94,466, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $91,357, a difference of 0.45%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $89,856, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.7%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 2.2%), male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 46.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 55.2%), currently married (44.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.8%), family households (61.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 89.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 61.2%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 12.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 35.0%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 52.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 77.2%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.0% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 113.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 57.8%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.5%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.6%).