Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Tohono O'odham

Fair
Tragic
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,085,592 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Tohono O'odham.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($94,429 compared to $72,193, a difference of 30.8%), per capita income ($39,163 compared to $30,256, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $69,068, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $33,205, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $45,248, a difference of 14.3%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 16.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
22.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 102.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 96.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 85.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 21.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 29.5%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 33.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
21.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 68.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
8.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 44.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
75.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 32.2%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.0%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.53, a difference of 8.2%), and family households (61.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 8.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Tragic
49.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 10.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.7%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.96%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.5%), and hearing disability (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 2.1%), disability (14.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
3.1%