Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Romanians

Fair
Excellent
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,931,737 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.738. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Romanians.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Romanian Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $48,445, a difference of 23.7%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $60,063, a difference of 20.7%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $91,994, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $64,142, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $53,632, a difference of 3.7%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 8.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanRomanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
28.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.1%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.3%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanRomanian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 93.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 91.6%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 91.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanRomanian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Good
83.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.1%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 31.2%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (61.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanRomanian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 42.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.52%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Fair
6.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 48.4%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 44.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.14%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.8%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanRomanian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Good
2.4%