Alaskan Athabascan vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,982,048 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($76,383 compared to $94,990, a difference of 24.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $111,051, a difference of 22.1%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $47,041, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $54,369, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $66,306, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 56.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 91.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 88.7%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 88.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 29.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.4%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 32.5%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 72.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.6%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 47.1%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 84.1%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 12.7%).