Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Chileans

Fair
Excellent
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chilean Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,004,724 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Chileans.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Chilean Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $46,459, a difference of 18.6%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $90,605, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $106,611, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $63,957, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanChilean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Exceptional
$46,459
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Exceptional
$108,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$90,605
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Exceptional
$48,504
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Exceptional
$56,973
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Exceptional
$40,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$53,185
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$99,900
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$106,611
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Exceptional
$63,957
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Fair
26.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.1%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanChilean
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
11.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 96.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 96.2%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 94.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanChilean
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanChilean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.3%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanChilean
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Good
30.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 57.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanChilean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Good
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
6.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 46.4%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 42.9%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.66%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.83%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanChilean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
62.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
49.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 85.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 53.6%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chilean Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanChilean
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
22.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%