Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,467,858 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.445% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 445.1 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $46,430, a difference of 18.6%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $87,930, a difference of 15.1%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $56,958, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $60,647, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $54,593, a difference of 5.6%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 49.7%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 86.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 85.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 83.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 55.3%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.31%), married-couple households (43.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 58.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.9%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 47.6%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.93%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 92.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.43%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.1%).