Alaskan Athabascan vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,766,734 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.815. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.294% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 293.9 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $54,526, a difference of 14.3%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $82,331, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $51,525, a difference of 0.37%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $75,961, a difference of 0.56%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $37,766, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 27.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.82%), single female poverty (23.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 74.0%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 73.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 27.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.9%), divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and family households (61.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.6% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 0.92%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 136.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 89.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 48.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.88%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 10.1%).