Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Cypriots

Fair
Excellent
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cypriot Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,558,591 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 20.6 Cypriots.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Cypriot Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,163 compared to $54,899, a difference of 40.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $123,396, a difference of 35.7%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $102,843, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $52,209, a difference of 0.96%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $71,714, a difference of 15.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanCypriot
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Exceptional
$54,899
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Exceptional
$127,064
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$102,843
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Exceptional
$54,589
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Exceptional
$65,549
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Exceptional
$45,570
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Average
$52,209
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$116,364
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$123,396
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Exceptional
$71,714
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 65.7%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 65.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.1%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanCypriot
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
13.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
8.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 90.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 89.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 82.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 10.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanCypriot
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Poor
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 33.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanCypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
84.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 83.3%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 44.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanCypriot
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
27.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 60.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 32.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 9.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCypriot
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
5.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 88.3%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 82.4%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.22%), 10th grade (95.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and 4th grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanCypriot
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
72.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
67.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
56.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
49.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
21.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 89.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 67.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Cypriot Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCypriot
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
43.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%