Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Creek

Fair
Fair
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,797,022 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.888. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.104% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 104.3 Creek.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Creek Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $51,949, a difference of 20.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $74,847, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $78,960, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.3%), median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $46,594, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($43,393 compared to $39,648, a difference of 9.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanCreek
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.25%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanCreek
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 82.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 81.4%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanCreek
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
77.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.7%), divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanCreek
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Tragic
37.6%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 100.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCreek
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.4%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.9%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.13%), 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and 5th grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanCreek
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 22.0%), hearing disability (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and male disability (14.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanCreek
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%