Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Fair
Fair
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,398,049 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.392% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 391.8 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $57,114, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $48,749, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($94,429 compared to $94,472, a difference of 0.040%), median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $38,028, a difference of 0.32%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $91,385, a difference of 0.48%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
22.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.9%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.71%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 93.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 89.9%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 88.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
82.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.3%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.6% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 0.56%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.78%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 0.79%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Poor
32.9%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 49.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Fair
6.2%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 114.5%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Poor
1.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 81.3%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and female disability (13.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Average
2.5%