Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,771,325 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 11.9 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $119,094, a difference of 30.9%), median household income ($76,383 compared to $99,943, a difference of 30.8%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $50,555, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $54,512, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $69,426, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 62.6%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 54.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.5%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 100.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 98.7%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 93.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 29.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.5%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 38.8%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (61.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 39.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.62%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 72.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.20%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 96.6%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.5%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 17.1%).