Alaskan Athabascan vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Chinese
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,584,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 46.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Chinese |
| Minimum | 6.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 94.0% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 41.2% | 16.1% |
| Median | 33.3% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.6% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.6% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.9% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.7% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |