Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,846,480 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 14.8 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 44.5%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $53,766, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $41,685, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $88,687, a difference of 0.27%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $89,394, a difference of 1.7%), and median male earnings ($49,748 compared to $50,795, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 39.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.23%), male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 54.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 55.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 55.8%), married-couple households (43.6% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.8%), family households (61.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 123.9%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 89.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 87.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 21.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 54.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 87.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 81.3%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 125.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 63.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.0%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.7%).