Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Tongans

Fair
Good
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tongan Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,817,689 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 7.3 Tongans.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Tongan Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($76,383 compared to $93,076, a difference of 21.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $108,643, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,446 compared to $99,604, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $38,288, a difference of 1.0%), median earnings ($43,393 compared to $45,665, a difference of 5.2%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $41,693, a difference of 6.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanTongan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Tragic
$41,693
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Excellent
$105,967
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Exceptional
$93,076
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Fair
$45,665
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Fair
$53,218
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Tragic
$38,288
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$56,972
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Exceptional
$99,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Exceptional
$108,643
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Exceptional
$68,235
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
27.5%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 66.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 54.1%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.9%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and female poverty (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanTongan
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
17.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 108.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 108.0%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 105.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanTongan
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanTongan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
41.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Excellent
83.1%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.0%), births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 32.9%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.49, a difference of 7.0%), currently married (44.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households (61.8% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 12.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanTongan
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
69.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
31.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
51.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
28.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 117.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 20.9%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanTongan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
92.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
63.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
26.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.2%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and associate's degree (36.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanTongan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
34.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Poor
1.7%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 83.4%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 11.6%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Tongan Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanTongan
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%