Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Alaskan Athabascans

Norwegians

Fair
Excellent
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,454,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 6.6 Norwegians.
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Norwegian Communities

Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $103,682, a difference of 14.0%), per capita income ($39,163 compared to $44,480, a difference of 13.6%), and median household income ($76,383 compared to $86,084, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $61,104, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $38,802, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $53,127, a difference of 2.7%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricAlaskan AthabascanNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,163
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,429
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,383
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,393
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,748
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,905
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,713
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,446
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,951
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,330
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Tragic
29.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 63.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 63.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and single female poverty (23.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 13.3%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricAlaskan AthabascanNorwegian
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
23.6%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 121.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 119.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 116.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAlaskan AthabascanNorwegian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAlaskan AthabascanNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.9%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.1%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
84.4%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.3%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.7%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.74%), family households (61.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.08, a difference of 6.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAlaskan AthabascanNorwegian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
29.3%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 142.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.99%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 9.0%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAlaskan AthabascanNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.0%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.2%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.0%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (36.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 30.6%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (98.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricAlaskan AthabascanNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.0%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Average
1.8%

Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 53.8%), hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.5%).
Alaskan Athabascan vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricAlaskan AthabascanNorwegian
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
13.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.0%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%